Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

3The Ndrf Assam Rifles C/O Apo vs The Union Of India And 4 Ors on 27 February, 2023

Author: Devashis Baruah

Bench: Devashis Baruah

                                                                     Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010096662022




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                 Case No. : WP(C)/3405/2022

            TENZING SHERPA
            S/O. LT. PASSANG SHERPA, SERVING AS A HAVILDAR/GD IN THE 1ST
            ASSAM RIFLES C/O. 99 APO, PIN-932001, PRESENTLY ON DEPUTATION AT
            13THE NDRF ASSAM RIFLES C/O APO.



            VERSUS

            THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS
            REP. BY THE SECRETARY, THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME
            AFFAIR NEW DELHI-110001.

            2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL

             ASSAM RIFLES
             HEAD QUARTER DIRECTORATE GENERAL
             ASSAM RIFLES SHILLONG-11.

            3:THE COMMANDANT 1ST ASSAM RIFLES

             C/O. 99 APO
             PIN-932001.

            4:THE COMMANDANT 13TH NATIONAL DISASTER RESPONSE FORCE

             ASSAM RIFLES C/O. 99 APO.

            5:G/01110880K WO/GD GOVERDHAN SINGH
             C/O. COMMANDANT 1ST ASSAM RIFLES
             C/O. 99 APO
             PIN-932001

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MS. S BORA
                                                                     Page No.# 2/2


Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I.




                                   BEFORE
                    HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

                                             ORDER

Date : 27.02.2023 Heard Ms. S. Bora, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. B. Deka, the learned CGC appearing on behalf of the respondents.

Mr. B. Deka, the learned CGC submits that pursuant to the order dated 08.02.2023, the respondents have duly instructed him to apprise this Court that the ACR of the petitioner for the year 2018-19 had not been communicated to him by his reporting officers or unit which aspect of the matter is clear from paragraph No. 25 of the affidavit-in-opposition.

Taking into account the same and the pleadings being completed, let the matter be listed on 10.04.2023 on which date, an attempt shall be made to dispose of the writ petition.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant