Moganna S/O Ningaiah @ Bundaiah vs Smt Sakamma W/O Moganna on 20 October, 2010

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Moganna S/O Ningaiah @ Bundaiah vs Smt Sakamma W/O Moganna on 20 October, 2010

Bench: K.Bhakthavatsala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY 01? OCTOBER 2010   

BEFORE

THE I-ION'BLE Dr. JUSTICE K. BHAKTHAv;r:.'3.¥fs;a;I;A: .

REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.2:'£--3:1/?..0;1._iI)  "   'V, 

BETWEEN:

Moganna,

S/o.Ningaiah @ Bunciaiah,
Aged about 75 years.

Occ: N11,

R/ o.Bommenaha}ii village,
Yelwala Hobh. 4.: ' 
Mysore Taluk. "  - '

(By sn.c.H.Jadh;$,y,  

AND:

Smt.Sakamma_ "
W/o.I\/Ioganna. V' _' _ _
Aged about 55 years, ' . 
131/.o.Ha1et1;.eedu village', A

I-Huf1sur"'¥a1uk;;  A. * ---------- ~ "

Mj,(sore«D_ist,  , *

.. .RESPONDENT

Ttiis is filed under Section 96 of CPC against the

« AA'_j'~..J.ud.gment 8: Decree dt.28.8.

-- .. V _ _ 2009 passed in O.S.No.5/2006 on the
_ ,_"fi1e._of the Judge, Family Court, Mysore, decreeing the suit for
' ' futuie maintenance.

3

VfThis appeal coming on for orders, this day, the Court

A liciielixzered the following-



JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellant submitsﬂthatiétﬁoiz 29.09.2010, a memo was filed for conversion of the p1*eser1'tu K [Regular First Appeal) into Miscellaneous :l*'irs't'App.eal_t V

2. The above said memo .for..__co1'1{rers'i0n '$10211-'ﬁe not lgeeln included in the case ﬁle. However'; for the appellant submits that the for wastﬁllved on the basis of the office objection First Appeal is rnaintainable as p}a;r_ Family Court?

:3. ln View is directed to convert Regular First Appeal. Accordingly, the Regular off.

sd/5'

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

Karnataka High Court