Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Fatehlal(Dead) Through Lrs vs The State Of Rajasthan on 8 August, 2023

Bench: Abhay S. Oka, Sanjay Karol

     ITEM NO.38                               COURT NO.7                     SECTION XVII

                                  S U P R E M E C O U R T O F            I N D I A
                                          RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Civil Appeal                No(s).    2620/2020

     FATEHLAL(DEAD) THROUGH LRS                                               Appellant(s)

                                                       VERSUS

     THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.                                            Respondent(s)

     (IA No. 42830/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
     JUDGMENT

IA No. 42829/2020 - STAY APPLICATION) Date : 08-08-2023 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL For Appellant(s) Mr. Rishabh Sancheti, Adv.
Ms. Padma Priya, Adv.
Mr. Anchit Bhandari, Adv.
Mr. Suyash Jain, Adv.
Mr. Chirag Kalani, Adv.
Mr. K. Paari Vendhan, AOR For Respondent(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Sandeep Kumar Jha, AOR Mr. Arpit Prakash, Adv.
Ms. Shubamgi Agarwal, Adv.
Mr. Nikhil Singhvi, Adv.
Ms. Supriya Juneja, AOR Mr. Mohit Seth, Adv.
Mr. Bilal Ikram, Adv.
Mr. S. K. Verma, AOR Mr. Mahesh Kasana, Adv.
Ms. Aparna Rohtagi Jain, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Anita Malhotra Date: 2023.08.10 After having heard the parties, we find that the 16:43:12 IST Reason: National Green Tribunal has not even considered the 1 prayers (a) and (d) of the application filed by the appellant. One of the allegations in the application was that area of the water tank (42½ bighas and 3 biswas) has been reduced due to encroachments. In fact, the respondent No.6 in his counter affidavit has accepted that area of the tank is 42.5 bighas and 3 biswas. The contention of the respondent No.6 is that the area of the water tank remains the same.
Another issue is whether there are encroachments on the catchment area of the water tank.
We direct the Chairperson of the Rajasthan Pollution Control Board to constitute a Committee of senior officers and experts in the field. The Committee so constituted shall make a site visit after notice to all the parties to the appeal for ascertaining whether area of the tank continues to be 42.5 bighas and 3 biswas and whether there are any encroachments. They shall also examine whether there are encroachments on the catchment area of the lake in question.
We are making it explicitly clear that the members of the Committee constituted by the Chairperson of the Rajasthan Pollution Control Board will act as the officers of this Court.
2 Needless to add that for the purposes of measurements, the district administration will render all possible help to the team constituted by the Chairperson of the Pollution Control Board by providing services of surveyors.
The Registry shall forward a copy of this order to the Chairperson of the Rajasthan Pollution Control Board.
A report along with the relevant sketches drawn and photographs shall be placed on record within a period of eight weeks from today.
The Pollution Control Board will supply copies of the report to the learned counsel representing all the parties.
List on 31st October, 2023, on the top of the Board.
(ANITA MALHOTRA)                               (AVGV RAMU)
   AR-CUM-PS                                  COURT MASTER




                             3