Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 4]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Volkswagen Finance Private Limited vs Shree Balaji Printopack Pvt. Ltd. on 7 January, 2021

Bench: D.Y. Chandrachud, Indira Banerjee, Sanjiv Khanna

                                                              1

     ITEM NO.23                        Court 5 (Video Conferencing)                      SECTION XVII

                                       S U P R E M E C O U R T O F            I N D I A
                                               RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                                            Civil Appeal      No(s).3858/2020

     VOLKSWAGEN FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED                                             Appellant(s)

                                                             VERSUS

     SHREE BALAJI PRINTOPACK PVT. LTD. & ANR.                                       Respondent(s)

     (WITH IA No.123999/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
     JUDGMENT and IA No.124000/2020-STAY APPLICATION)

     Date : 07-01-2021 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                              HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
                              HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE
                              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

     For Appellant(s)                       Mr. Sanjeev Sagar, Adv.
                                            Mr. Shekhar Raj Sharma, Adv.
                                            Mr. Jinendra Jain, AOR

     For Respondent(s)                      Mr. Sharad Tyagi, Adv.
     (R-1)

                           UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                  O R D E R

1 We have heard Mr Sanjeev Sagar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and Mr Sharad Tyagi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the first respondent.

2 Mr Sanjeev Sagar undertakes to serve a copy of the paper book to the learned counsel for the first respondent.

3 It has been submitted, on the basis of the provisions contained in Sections 3(30) Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Sanjay Kumar Date: 2021.01.07 and 3(31) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 1, that:

19:04:35 IST Reason:
1 “IBC” 2
(i) The appellant has a security interest, created in terms of the hypothecation agreement for a vehicle against a loan of Rs 36 lakhs advanced to the corporate debtor;

(ii) The charge is registered under the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 and was endorsed on the certificate of registration;

iii) The charge is recognized by the provisions of sub-section (3) and (4) of Section 77 of the Companies Act 2013; and

(iv) The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has erroneously interpreted the provisions of Section 52(3) of the IBC and Regulation 21 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations 2016.

4 Issue notice, returnable on 8 February 2021.

5 Counter affidavit shall be filed, in the meantime. 6 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the contesting parties shall file brief written submissions at least one week before the next date of listing to facilitate the final disposal of the appeal.

           (SANJAY KUMAR-I)                                    (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR)
              AR-CUM-PS                                           COURT MASTER