Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 9]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Jitendra Yadav vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 7 May, 2021

Author: Rohit Arya

Bench: Rohit Arya

 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT INDORE

                         M. Cr. C. No.22315/2021
                      (Jitendra Yadav Vs. State of M. P.)
                                     -1-

Indore, dated 07/05/2021

      Heard through Video Conferencing.

      Shri Anopam Chouhan, learned counsel for the applicant.

      Shri   Shantanu     Sharma,      learned    Panel     Lawyer   for   the

respondent / State.

This is second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of the applicant. The applicant is in custody since 21/12/2020 in connection with Crime No.322/2020 registered at P.S. Nahar Darwaja, District Dewas (M.P.) for the offence punishable under Sections 49-A and 34(2) of the M.P. Excise Act. His first bail application was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 09/02/2021 passed in M.Cr.C.No.5856/2021.

As per prosecution story, the applicant along with co-accused persons was found to be in illegal and unauthorized possession of 800 liters of Spirit. Accordingly, case has been registered against the applicant.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the offence. Investigation is complete and charge-sheet has been filed. He is not required for further custodial investigation as chalan has been filed. Applicant has already suffered jail incarceration since 21/12/2020. He is the sole bread earner and due to his long jail incarceration, his family is in penury and on the verge of starvation. Moreso, looking to the Covid-19 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT INDORE M. Cr. C. No.22315/2021 (Jitendra Yadav Vs. State of M. P.) -2- situation, trial is not likely to conclude early in the near future. Under such circumstances, the prayer for grant of bail may be considered on such terms and conditions as this Court deems fit and proper.

Per contra, learned Panel Lawyer opposes the bail application supporting the order impugned.

At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions graciously and voluntarily submits that looking to grave critical social economic condition of poor persons living in old age homes, Vidhwa Ashrams or orphans living in orphanage, the applicant is prepared to deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lac only) in the office of Jila Bal Sanrakshan Samiti, Dewas (HDFC Bank Account No.50100066055416 IFSC Code HDFC0000887) for the purpose of providing basic amenities, clothing, food/food items and other essential amenities required for old age people living in old age homes, vidhwas living in vidhwa aashrams or orphans living in orphanage and also to sufferers of Covid-19 Pandemic in the city of Dewas in dire need of such amenities/facilities. However, the aforesaid deposit of amount may not influence the pending trial but is only, for enlargement of applicant on bail.

Upon hearing counsel for the parties but without touching merits of the contentions so advanced, regard being had to the fact that applicant is in jail since 21/12/2020, investigation is complete and charge sheet has been filed, he is not required for custodial HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT INDORE M. Cr. C. No.22315/2021 (Jitendra Yadav Vs. State of M. P.) -3- interrogation. Moreso, due to Covid-19 pandemic, possibility of delay in conclusion of trial cannot be ruled out. Hence, he is held entitled for enlargement on bail.

Consequently, the application of the applicant filed under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 is hereby allowed. It is directed that the applicant be released on bail furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rs. Three Lacs Only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court and on the condition that he shall remain present before the Court concerned during trial and also comply with the conditions enumerated under Section 437 (3) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 with following further conditions:-

(i) the applicant shall prepare a demand draft of Rs.1,00,000/-

(Rs. One Lac only) in favour of Jila Bal Sanrakshan Samiti, Dewas (HDFC Bank Account No.50100066055416 IFSC Code HDFC0000887) to be utilized for the purpose of providing basic amenities, clothing, food/food items and other essential amenities required for old age people living in old age homes, vidhwas living in vidhwa aashrams and orphans living in orphanage and also to sufferers of Covid-19 Pandemic in the city of Dewas in dire need of such amenities/facilities and the amount so deposited shall have no bearing or relevance on the pending trial to the prejudice of the applicant.

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT INDORE M. Cr. C. No.22315/2021 (Jitendra Yadav Vs. State of M. P.) -4-

(ii)(a) the applicant shall submit the original demand drafts alongwith copy of the order passed today through his counsel before the Principal Registrar of this Bench, for keeping the same in his safe custody.

(ii)(b) as and when directed, the Principal Registrar shall seek instructions/directions through PUD from this Court for handing over the demand draft to the concerned authority in that behalf.

(ii)(c) the Registry is directed to accept the original demand draft without mentioning the account number therein. However, ensure that the same is in relation to the present case.

(iii) the Collector, Dewas is at its discretion to utilize the amount so deposited as and where it is required upon verification. The Collector, Dewas is also directed to maintain a separate account (for production of the record as and when directed for).

(iv) the applicant shall mark his attendance before the concerned police station on 2nd and 4th Saturday of every month between 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon.

(v) the applicant will abide by the terms and conditions of various circulars and orders issued by the Government of India and the State Government as well as the local administration from to time in the matter of maintaining social distancing, physical distancing, hygiene, etc., to avoid proliferation of Novel Corona virus (COVID-19); HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT INDORE M. Cr. C. No.22315/2021 (Jitendra Yadav Vs. State of M. P.) -5-

(vi) the concerned jail authorities are directed that before releasing the applicant, the medical examination of the applicant be conducted through the jail doctor and if it is prima facie found that he is having any symptoms of Covid-19, then the consequential follow up action or any further test required be undertaken immediately. If not, the applicant shall be released on bail in terms of the conditions imposed in this order.

(vii) in the event of violation of any of the terms and conditions of the order by the applicant, the prosecution is at liberty to seek cancellation of the bail granted to the applicant.

(viii) in future, if the applicant is found to be involved in such nature of cases or any other similar criminal cases or misuse the bail granted by this Court, this bail order shall stand cancelled automatically.

Observations made on facts touching merits of the case are only for the purpose of deciding the bail application and shall not have any bearing on the pending trial.

Learned Panel Lawyer is directed to send an e-copy of this order to all the concerned including the concerned Station House Officer of the police station for information and necessary action.

E-certified copy as per rules.

(ROHIT ARYA) JUDGE Tej Digitally signed by TEJPRAKASH VYAS Date: 2021.05.07 17:41:28 -07'00'