Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court

Subir Saha vs The Kolkata Municipal Corporation And ... on 22 May, 2023

Author: Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

Bench: Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

OD-3

                      IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                         Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
                                ORIGINAL SIDE

                               WPO/1215/2023

                               SUBIR SAHA
                                   VS
               THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.


BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA
Date : 22nd May, 2023.
[VACATION BENCH]



                                                                       Appearance:
                                                   Mr. Raghunath Chakraborty, Adv.
                                                            Ms. Tanusree Das, Adv.
                                                                 ...for the petitioner

                                                       Mr. Gopal Chandra Das, Adv.
                                                            Ms. Manisha Nath, Adv.
                                                                   ...for the K.M.C.




       The Court:- The petitioner has challenged the hearing notice dated 12th

April, 2023.

       It appears from the said notice that the authorities of the Kolkata

Municipal Corporation fixed the date of hearing on April 28, 2023. Mr.

Chakraborty, learned Advocate representing the petitioner submits that the

authorities are trying to reopen its own decision whereby the unauthorized

construction at premises no. 895, Madurdaha, Ward-108, Borough No.XII,

Kolkata-700107 within the Kolkata Municipal Corporation has been regularized.

He further submits that pursuant to the said order the fees demanded by the

Kolkata Municipal Corporation has already been deposited.
                                           2

       Mr. Das, learned Advocate representing the Kolkata Municipal Corporation

submits that pursuant to the said hearing notice, the person responsible as well

as the complainant attended the said hearing on 28th April, 2023. Mr. Das

produces a copy of the attendance sheet. From the said attendance sheet it

appears that the hearing was conducted by the authorities as per the provisions

of Section 400(1) read with Section 416 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation,

1980. Mr. Das further submits that the petitioner herein has not complied with

all the directions contained in the order dated 28th August, 2019. Since the

hearing notice is under challenge and it appears from the attendance sheet that

the person responsible as well as the complainant attended the said hearing,

there is no scope to pass any interim order at this stage. The respondent will at

be at liberty to file affidavit-in-opposition within June 16, 2023; reply thereto, if any, be filed on or before June 23, 2023.

The parties will be at liberty to mention for enlistment of the matter after the period fixed for exchange of affidavits is over.

(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.) S.Bag/TO