Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Shri. M S Raja vs Comptroller And Auditor General on 20 October, 2011

                      CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                          Club Building (Near Post Office)
                        Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067
                               Tel: +91-11-26161796
                                                       Decision No. CIC/SM/A/2011/001064/SG/15227
                                                              Appeal No. CIC/SM/A/2011/001064/SG
Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal:

Appellant                            :         Mr. M. S. Raja
                                               15/1089-90
                                               Vasundhara(PO),
                                               Ghaziabad(UP)-201012

Respondent                           :         Mr. R. Srinivasan

PIO & Pr. Legal Advisor O/o Comptroller and Auditor General of India CAG of India 9 DDU Marg, New Delhi-110124 RTI application filed on : 05/10/2010 PIO replied on : 03/12/2010 First Appeal filed on : 31/12/2010 First Appellate Authority order on : 22/02/2011 Second Appeal received on : 31/03/2011 S.No Information Sought Reply of PIO Order of FAA st

1. In IA & AD, when the The 1 concrete step towards The information has been Departmental Council was formation of the departmental supplied regarding the formed and when was its Council-IA&AD in the post available records. Efforts first meeting? CCS(RSA) Rules,1993, scenario could tracing previous records be taken only after the then Dia had are being made. invited 2 representatives each from All India Audit Federation and All India A&E Association. The former was represented by S/Shri AB Sen, its secretary general and SK Vyas, the leader staff side erstwhile Department Council-IA&AD. IA&AD was formed in the year 2005 and its first ordinary meeting, subsequently christened as the XXVII Ordinary Meeting of the Departmental Council IA&AD was held on 25th august 2006, in which the appellant has participated as the Secretary Staff Side.

2. On which date Constitution Fresh constitution was framed in Reiterated PIO's Reply.

of Departmental Council 2005.A copy was sent to the then (JCM)/IA & AD was cabinet secretary and the Secretary to adopted? Minutes of the GOI, DOPT. with the meeting ON meeting in which it was 25.08.2006, the new constitution came adopted and copy of the into existence.copy is enclosed. constitution.

3. Declaration of joint intent The Departmental Council's No Amendments have regarding the common Constitution has been in force since been made. Further no approach of GoI and the 2005. No need has arisen to revisit it meeting of the employees Organisation to or seek any change in the same. departmental Coulcil work the machinery of Joint could be held after Consultation and 25.08.2006. hence no Compulsary Arbitration details by appellant exist.

           states that "Both the parties
           are     agreed    that   any
           provision of this declaration
           or of the scheme could be
           amended        by      mutual
           agreement at any time".
           Whether any amendments
           were made in that? If yes,
           minutes of the meeting that
           agreed for amendments be
           supplied.
4.          i.Please provide copy of the The instructions dated 19.04.1995 and                   No instructions from GoI,
           DOPT's instruction that did 7th april,2004 may be obtained from                       whereby an ex-employee
           not provide for retired DOPT.                                                         can be taken as a staff
           employees as members of                                                               member        in      the
           staff side.                                                                           departmental      Council.
           ii.Copy of correspondences                                                            Retired employees cannot
           with DOPT on the issue of                                                             be                Official
           nomination of shri SK Vyas                                                            Bearers/Members         of
           as member, Staff Side,                                                                federations.
           Departmental Council(JC
           M/)IA&AD may please be
           supplied.copy      of     file
           notings be provided.

Grounds for the First Appeal:

Not Satisfied with the reply of the PIO.

Ground of the Second Appeal:

Not Satisfied with the reply of the FAA. Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:
The following were present Appellant: Mr. M. S. Raja;
Respondent: Mr. R. Srinivasan, PIO & Pr. Legal Advisor;
The PIO has given the information available on the records but the Appellant would like to inspect the relevant records on 04 November 2011 from 11.00AM onwards at the office of the PIO.
Decision:
The Appeal is allowed.
The PIO is directed to facilitate an inspection of the relevant records by the Appellant on 04 November 2011 from 11.00Am onwards. The PIO will give attested copies of records which the Appellant wants free of cost upto 100 pages. This decision is announced in open chamber. Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties. Any information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.
Shailesh Gandhi Information Commissioner 20 October 2011 (In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.) (MS)