Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Allahabad High Court

Soni Thakur vs Aditya Sharma on 12 January, 2021

Bench: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Sanjay Kumar Pachori





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 21
 

 
Case :- FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 333 of 2020
 
Appellant :- Soni Thakur
 
Respondent :- Aditya Sharma
 
Counsel for Appellant :- Vishakha Pande,Jyoti Kumar Singh,Rakesh Pande (Senior Adv.)
 

 
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
 

Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.

This appeal though has been filed with a delay condonation application but is against an order dated 22.10.2020, which has been passed by a Family Court in proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C.

Sri Imran Syed, learned counsel for the defendant/respondent has raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the appeal on the ground thatSection 19 (2) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 provides that no appeal shall lie from a decree or order passed by the Family Court with the consent of the parties or from an order passed under Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and as such, in view of provision of Section 19(2) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, present appeal under Section 19 of the Act shall not lie against the impugned order dated 22.10.2020 under Section 125 Cr. P.C. passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Agra.

Confronted with this situation, learned counsel for the appellant states that the appellant wants to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to avail such remedy as may be available under law.

The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

The office is directed to return the certified copy of the order to the appellant after retaining a copy of the same.

Order Date :- 12.1.2021 RKP