Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Rambhau S/O Awadut Gawai And Others vs Shivlal S/O Shalikram Belsare (Dead) ... on 19 September, 2019

Author: M. G. Giratkar

Bench: M. G. Giratkar

                                                     1                                 cao 507.18.odt


                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                              NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

                          Civil Application (CAO) No. 507 of 2018
                                             and
                       Misc. Civil Application (St.) No. 18310 of 2017
                                              in
                              First Appeal No. 510 of 2007 (D)
[Rambhau s/o Awadut Gawai Vs. Shivlal s/o Shalikram Belsare (Dead) through his legal heirs
                              Ratu S. Belsare and ors.]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of                             Court's or Judge's Order
Coram, appearances, Court's Orders
or directions and Registrar's order
                                  Shri P. R. Agrawal, Advocate for the applicants/appellants

                                  CORAM : M. G. GIRATKAR, J.

DATE : 19/09/2019 Heard learned Advocate Shri Agrawal for the applicants/appellants.

Both these applications are filed for condonation of delay to restore the appeal and for restoration of appeal.

The appeal was dismissed for not filing paper book. Learned Advocate Shri Agrawal submits that delay was caused because of time in obtaining the certified copy. He has submitted that the appellants have good case on merit and they have ready to file paper book within two days. Hence, the applications are allowed. Delay is condoned. The appeal is restored at the stage when it was dismissed. ::: Uploaded on - 19/09/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 20/09/2019 05:27:02 :::

2 cao 507.18.odt Pursis Stamp No. 10891/2019 Heard learned Advocate Shri Agrawal. During the pendency of appeal, respondent no. 1(c) died. Legal representatives of 1(c), namely, respondent nos. 1(a) and 1(b) are already on record, therefore, no steps are required to bring legal representatives of respondent no. 1(c) on record. Hence, name of respondent no. 1(c) be deleted from the array of respondents.

First Appeal No. 510 of 2007

Appeal is of year 2007. Put up the matter for final hearing.

JUDGE wasnik ::: Uploaded on - 19/09/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 20/09/2019 05:27:02 :::