Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 9]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Cit, Patiala vs Kiran Rani, Dinesh Goel And Ors on 25 January, 2016

Author: Ajay Kumar Mittal

Bench: Ajay Kumar Mittal

                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                                             AT CHANDIGARH

                                                                      ITA No. 506 of 2010
                                                                      Decided on : 25.01.2016

              The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh
                                                                                      . . . Appellant
                                                         Versus
              Kiran Rani, Denesh Goel & others
                                                                                   . . . Respondents

              CORAM:              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
                                  HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAJ RAHUL GARG

              PRESENT: Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Advocate
                       for the appellant-revenue.

                                  Mr. Divya Suri, Advocate and
                                  Mr. Sachin Bhardwaj, Advocate
                                  for the respondent-assessee.
                                                          ****

              AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)

Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since the tax effect involved is ` 5,15,390/-, she has instructions to withdraw the present appeal in view of the circular No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015 issued by the C.B.D.T., New Delhi. However, she prayed that liberty be granted to the revenue to file an application for revival of the appeal in case something survives therein.

2. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is, however, clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the revenue shall not be taken to be affirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further, the legal issue as claimed by the revenue is being left open to be adjudicated in an appropriate case.



                                                                  (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)
                                                                         JUDGE


                                                                     (RAJ RAHUL GARG)
              January 25, 2016                                             JUDGE
JAWALA RAM    J.Ram
2016.02.01 16:37
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
Chandigarh