Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune

Rajesh Pandurang Patil, Kolhapur vs The Income-Tax Officer, Ward –(1)2, ... on 5 August, 2022

     IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
              PUNE BENCH "SMC", PUNE

       BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, VICE PRESIDENT

           आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.240/PUN/2020
            नधारण वष / Assessment Year : 2014-15

     Rajesh Pandurang Patil,                  ITO,
     House No.21, At Karanjoshi,      Vs.     Ward-1(2),
     Post Shahuwadi,                          Kolhapur
     Dist. Kolhapur - 415 101
     Maharashtra
     PAN : ARUPP4032G
        (Appellant)                           (Respondent)
 Appellant by                None
 Respondent by               Shri M.G. Jasnani

 Date of hearing             03-08-2022
 Date of pronouncement       05-08-2022

                       आदे श / ORDER

PER R.S.SYAL, VP :

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-1, Kolhapur on 10-10-2019 in relation to the assessment year 2014-15.

2. The assessee is aggrieved by certain additions and disallowances as have been set out in the assessment order.

3. I have heard the ld. DR and gone through the relevant material on record. There is no appearance from the side of the assessee despite notice. It is seen that the assessee furnished a return declaring total income of Rs.2,22,020/-. The Assessing 2 ITA No. 240/PUN/2020 Rajesh Pandurang Patil Officer (AO) completed the assessment u/s.144 of the Act determining total income at Rs.35,51,850/-. In view of the fact that the assessment has been completed ex parte qua the assessee, I am of the considered opinion that it would be in the fitness of the things if the impugned order is set-aside and the matter is restored to the file of AO. I order accordingly and direct him to frame the assessment afresh as per law after allowing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

4. In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the Open Court on 05th August, 2022.

Sd/-

(R.S.SYAL) उपा य / VICE PRESIDENT पण ु े Pune; दनांक Dated : 05 August, 2022 th Satish 3 ITA No. 240/PUN/2020 Rajesh Pandurang Patil आदे श क त ल प अ े षत / Copy of the Order is forwarded to :

1. अपीलाथ / The Appellant;
2. यथ / The Respondent;
3. The CIT(A)-1, Kolhapur
4. The Pr.CIT-1, Kolhapur वभागीय त न ध, आयकर अपील!य अ धकरण, पण ु े "SMC"
5. / DR 'SMC', ITAT, Pune;
6. गाड फाईल / Guard file.

आदे शानस ु ार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune Date

1. Draft dictated on 03-08-2022 Sr.PS

2. Draft placed before author 05-08-2022 Sr.PS

3. Draft proposed & placed before -- JM the second member

4. Draft discussed/approved by -- JM Second Member.

5. Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS Sr.PS/PS

6. Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS

7. Date of uploading order Sr.PS

8. File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS

9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk

10. Date on which file goes to the A.R.

11. Date of dispatch of Order.

*