Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

S.Syed Ahamed vs / on 10 November, 2021

Author: Anita Sumanth

Bench: Anita Sumanth

                                                                              W.P.(MD)No.3591 of 2018


                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                               DATED: 10.11.2021

                                                     CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

                                            W.P.(MD)No.3591 of 2018


                     S.Syed Ahamed                                      ...Petitioner

                                                        /Vs./

                     1.The Secretary to Government
                       Housing and Urban development/Chairman,
                       Slum Clearance Board,
                       Fort St. George,
                       Chennai-09.

                     2.The Principal Secretary/Managing Director,
                       Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board,
                       No.5 Kamarajar Salai,
                       Chennai-05.                                      ...Respondents

                     PRAYER:- Writ Petition - filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                     India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the
                     respondents to tag in the 17 years of service rendered in the TAPCO
                     along with the service rendered in Slum Clearance Board for calculation
                     of pension and other benefits with all consequential benefits accepting
                     the surrender of terminal benefits Rs.1,04,150/- received by the petitioner


                     1/6



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                               W.P.(MD)No.3591 of 2018


                     at the time of termination due to retrenchment from TAPCO.


                                  For Petitioner     : Mr.V.Venkataseshan
                                  For R1             : Mr.K.S.Selvaganesan
                                                       counsel for state
                                  For R2             : Mr.P.Mahendran
                                                       Standing counsel


                                                      ORDER

Read this order in conjunction with my order dated 08.11.2021 extracted below:

“ The petitioner has prayed for a Mandamus directing the respondents to count his service of 17 years in the Tamil Nadu Poultry Development Corporation (TAPCO) along with service rendered by him in the Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board (TNSCB) for computation of pension and benefits.

2.The respondents have filed a common counter, along with a compliation of documents, wherein they refer to Letter bearing No.6137/SC2-2/2014-15 dated 11.04.2018, which, though not referring to the petitioner by name, refers to 34 employees, who were absorbed in the TNSCB, after closure 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.3591 of 2018 of TAPCO.

3.In all those cases, there had been a proposal for counting of their service in TAPCO for pensionary benefits at the time of superannuation from the TNSCB, which proposal had come to be rejected.

4.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks sometime to obtain instructions in this matter.

5.List on 10.11.2021. ” 2 . I have, at paragraph No.2 therein, referred to Letter bearing No.6137/SC2-2/2014-15 dated 11.04.2018 which rejects a proposal made with reference to 34 employees of TAPCO, who were absorbed in TNSCB. The employees had sought inclusion of their services in TAPCO in computing pension and benefits at the time of their superannuation from TNSCB. In light of the rejection as aforesaid, the mandamus sought for by the petitioner is liable to be rejected and I do so. This writ petition is thus dismissed.

3. Mr.V.Venkataseshan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that letter dated 11.04.2018 has been brought to 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.3591 of 2018 their attention only now and moreover, it is contrary to the dicta of various decisions to the effect that the entirety of continuous service put in by the employees should be taken into account at the time of superannuation for computation of terminal benefits. Liberty is thus granted to the petitioner to challenge communication dated 11.04.2018, if so advised. No costs.




                                                                                   10.11.2021
                     Index        :Yes/No
                     ssb

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

4/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.3591 of 2018 To

1.The Secretary to Government Housing and Urban development/Chairman, Slum Clearance Board, Fort St. George, Chennai-09.

2.The Principal Secretary/Managing Director, TN Slum Clearance Board, No.5 Kamarajar Salai, Chennai-05.

5/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.3591 of 2018 DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.

ssb Order made in W.P.(MD)No.3591 of 2018 Dated:

10.11.2021 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis