Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

K.Dinesh vs The Chief Electoral Officer on 10 April, 2019

Bench: S.Manikumar, Subramonium Prasad

                                                           1

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED: 10.04.2019

                                                        CORAM:

                                    THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR
                                                     and
                                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

                                               W.P.No.10993 of 2019
                                                       and
                                               WMP No.11424 of 2019

                   K.Dinesh                                                    .. Petitioner

                                                          Vs.

                   1. The Chief Electoral Officer,
                   Public (Election) Department,
                   Secretariat, Fort St. George,
                   Chennai.

                   2. The Assistant Commissioner of Police,
                   In Charge Officer,
                   No.20, Coimbatore Parliamentary Constituency,
                   Coimbatore.                                                 .. Respondents


                   Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
                   issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the
                   impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent vide Na.Ka.No.373/SWS/20 CBE
                   PC/2019 dated 3.4.2019 and quash the same as illegal and unconstitutional,
                   most specifically it is against Article 19 (1) (a) and 19 (1) (c) and Article 21 of
                   Constitution of India and consequently directing the respondents to permit the
                   petitioner to hold the Public Meeting at VKK Menan Road, Near Jeya Bakery,
                   Siddhapudur, Coimbatore City on any date not later than the date of the
                   election which is scheduled on 18.4.2019.


http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                          2

                               For Petitioner       : Mr.E.Vijay Anand

                               For Respondents      : Mr.Niranjan Rajagopalan
                                                      Standing Counsel for ECI

                                                    ORDER

(Order of this Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J.) Petitioner has sought for permission to conduct a meeting on 07.04.2019 at VKK Menan Road, Near Jeya Bakery, Siddhapudur, Coimbatore City. Vide order dated 03.04.2019, Assistant Commissioner of Police, In charge of No.20, Coimbatore Parliamentary Constituency, Coimbatore, the 2nd respondent, has rejected the request of the petitioner and the same is challenged in this writ petition, by way of a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for records of the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent vide Na.Ka.No.373/SWS/20 CBE PC/2019 dated 3.4.2019 and to quash the same, as illegal and unconstitutional, most specifically it is against Article 19 (1) (a) and 19 (1) (c) and Article 21 of Constitution of India and also sought for a consequential direction to the respondents, to permit the petitioner to hold Public Meeting at VKK Menan Road, Near Jeya Bakery, Siddhapudur, Coimbatore City on any date not later than the date of the election which is scheduled on 18.4.2019.

2. Inviting the attention of this Court to an order made in WP No.20174 of 2010 dated 19.01.2011, passed by one of us [Hon'ble Mr.Justice S.Manikumar], in S.Sivabalan Vs. Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tiruppur Sub-Division, http://www.judis.nic.in Tiruppur 641 607 and another, reported in 2011(3) MLJ 1046 3 and another decision in P.Manimaran Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam South Chennai District Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, reported in 2014 SCC OnLine Mad 11017, Mr.E.Vijay Anand, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there cannot be a total ban on May Seventeen Movement in conducting a public meeting on the subject “Saving Tamilnadu People's Right”.

3. Taking notice on behalf of the Chief Electoral Officer, Public (Election) Department, Chennai, 1st respondent, Mr.Niranjan Rajagopalan, learned counsel for the Election Commission of India submitted that order made in WP No.20174 of 2010 dated 19.01.2011, cannot be made applicable, in all circumstances and on the facts and circumstances of this case, police has noticed that “May Seventeen Movement”, is in the habit of speaking against the Constitution of India and various cases have been registered. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore City, 2nd respondent has expressed that there will be a law and order problem, if permission is granted and accordingly, rejected the permission. He also submitted that when Model Code of Conduct is in force, authorities have to be given the latitude to take into consideration, maintenance of law and order, which has been taken note of and therefore, for the abovesaid reasons prayed for dismissal of the writ petition.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the materials http://www.judis.nic.in 4 available on record.

5. Order in Na.Ka.No.373/SWS/20 CBE PC/2019 dated 03.04.2019 of the Single Window / Permission Granting Officer, 20 Coimbatore Parliamentary Constituencies, The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Land Grabbing Division, Coimbatore City, impugned in this writ petition reads thus.

Sub: Election 2019-2010 Coimbatore Parliamentary Constituency - May Seventeen Movement Application dated 07/04/2019 - Public Meeting - in the name of "Saving Tamil Nadu People's Right" at VKK Menan Road, Near Jeya Bakery, SiddhaPudur - Reg Ref: 1. Application dated 02/04/2019 from K.Dinesh, No.16/23, Karunanithi Nagar, Sowripalaiyam, Coimbatore

- 641 028.

2. Report dated 03/04/2019 from C1 Kaadoor Inspector and The Assistant Commissioner, Law & Order (Central) Coimbatore.

ORDER:

Mr.K.Dinesh had by his application sought for permission to conduct a public meeting on 7/04/2019 around 5PM in VKK Menan Road, Near Jeya Bakery, Siddhapudur, Gandhipuram.
On receipt of report 2nd above referred, it is seen that the petitioner movement is in the habit of speaking against Indian Constitution and various cases are registered in various district's and is pending. If permission is granted there will be a law & order problem and permission sought for his rejected."
6. Permission has been sought for is to conduct a public meeting on 07.04.2019 at 5.00Pm at VKK Menan Road, Near Jeya Bakery, Siddhapudur, Coimbatore City. Date for which permission sought for, is over. Even taking for granted http://www.judis.nic.in that interference is called for, inasmuch as the date had already 5 expired, no purpose would be served in setting aside the order, on merits.
7. Therefore, without going into the aspect as to whether the order impugned can be justified or not for the reasons stated therein, we permit the petitioner to make a fresh application to the concerned and on receipt of the same, pass orders in accordance with law.
8. Writ petition is dismissed. No Costs. Consequently, the connected writ miscellaneous petition is closed.
(S.M.K., J.) (S.P., J.) 10.04.2019 Note to office:
Issue order copy by today.
Index: Yes / No Internet: Yes / No ars http://www.judis.nic.in 6 S.MANIKUMAR, J.
AND SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J.
ars To
1. The Chief Electoral Officer, Public (Election) Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai.
2. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, In Charge Officer, No.20, Coimbatore Parliamentary Constituency, Coimbatore.
W.P.No.10993 of 2019 and WMP No.11424 of 2019
10.04.2019 http://www.judis.nic.in