Madhya Pradesh High Court
Shiv Prasad vs Mst.Motia & Ors on 30 March, 2022
Author: Arun Kumar Sharma
Bench: Arun Kumar Sharma
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR SHARMA
ON THE 30th OF MARCH, 2022
MISC. APPEAL No. 924 of 2004
Between:-
SHIV PRASAD, S/O SHRI RAMHIT MUDAHA, AGED
ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O PANTI, P.S AND TAHSIL
HANUMANA, DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(NONE FOR THE PETITIONER )
AND
1. MST.MOTIA & ORS (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. SMT. GULABKALI D/O CHHATILAL W/O
JAGJIWANLAL PRAJAPATI , AGED ABOUT 36
YEARS, GADA, P.S. SHAHPURA,TEH. HANUMANA
(MADHYA PRADESH)
3. SMT. SUNITA, D/O CHHATILAL W/O SIDDHNATH ,
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, BIJHOULI, TEH.
HANUMANA (MADHYA PRADESH)
4. SMT. HIROUA D/O CHHATILAL W/O KAILASH
NATH PRAJAPATI , AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
BIJHOULI, TEH. HANUMANA (MADHYA PRADESH)
5. SMT. SHANTI D/O CHHATILAL W/O SHIVIOCHEN
PRAJAPATI , AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, MALAIYA
P.S. PATEHRA, TEH. HANUMANA (MADHYA
PRADESH)
6. RAN KHELAWAN S/O LATE CHHATILAL , AGED
ABOUT 20 YEARS, VILAGE PANTI P.S. AND TEH.
HANUMANA, (MADHYA PRADESH)
7. KALLOO S/O LATE CHHATILAL , AGED ABOUT 25
Y E A R S , VILLAGE PANTI,P.S. AND TEH.
HANUMANA, (MADHYA PRADESH)
8. MUNNA S/O LATE CHHATILAL , AGED ABOUT 30
Y E A R S , VILLAGE PANTI,P.S. AND TEH.
HANUMANA, (MADHYA PRADESH)
9. RAM MILAN S/O LATE CHHATILAL , AGED ABOUT
35 YEARS, VILLAGE PANTI,P.S. AND TEH.
HANUMANA, (MADHYA PRADESH)
10. MAT. CHIDDHI BAI W/O CHHATILAL , AGED
ABOUT 70 YEARS, VILLAGE PANTI,P.S. AND TEH.
HANUMANA, (MADHYA PRADESH)
11. SMT. CHIDDI, W/O RAMDHANI , AGED ABOUT 62
2
YEAR S, R / O VILLAGE PANTI, P.S. AND TEHSIL
HANUMANA (MADHYA PRADESH)
12. SITARAM S/O RAMSHIROMANI , AGED ABOUT 40
YEAR S, R / O VILLAGE PATNI, P.S. AND TEHSIL
HANUMANA (MADHYA PRADESH)
13. MAHABALI S/O VRINDAWAN , AGED ABOUT 62
YE A R S , VI LLAGE PANTI , P.S. AND TEHSIL
HANUMANA (MADHYA PRADESH)
14. BUDDHASEN S/O VRINDAWAN , AGED ABOUT 52
Y E A R S , VILLAGE PANTI,P.S. AND TEH.
HANUMANA, (MADHYA PRADESH)
15. ANJANI KUMAR S/O KASHI PRASAD , AGED
ABOUT 40 YEARS, VILLAGE PATI, P.S. AND TEH.
HANUMAN, (MADHYA PRADESH)
16. TRIGUNI, S/O KASHI PRASAD , AGED ABOUT 32
YEAR S, R / O VILLAGE PATNI, P.S. AND TEHSIL
HANUMANA (MADHYA PRADESH)
17. SMT. DROPATI D/O KASHI PRASAD W/O RAVI
PRATAP DUBEY , AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, BHATHI,
TEH. HANUMANA (MADHYA PRADESH)
18. SMT. TARA D/O KASHI PRASAD W/O MADAN
MOHAN DWIVEDI, , AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
BHATHI ,TEH. HANUMANA (MADHYA PRADESH)
19. SMT. SAVITA D/O KASHI PRASAD, W/O BHOLA
PRASAD , AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
JHAKHARAWAL, TEH. DEOSAR, (MADHYA
PRADESH)
20. RAMADHAR S/O RAGHURAI MUDAHA , AGED
ABOUT 52 YEARS, R /O VILLAGE PATNI, P.S. AND
TEHSIL HANUMANA (MADHYA PRADESH)
21. RAMANUJ S/O RAGHUAI MUDAHA VILLAGE
PANTI,P.S. AND TEH. HANUMANA, (MADHYA
PRADESH)
22. CHHATANKI S/O MUDAHA , AGED ABOUT 52
YEAR S, R / O VILLAGE PATNI, P.S. AND TEHSIL
HANUMANA (MADHYA PRADESH)
23. RAMDARASH S/O SONHAI MUDAHA , AGED
ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE PANTI
MAHATMAN POLICE STATION AND TEH.
HANUMANA DISTT. REWA (MADHYA PRADESH)
24. RAMJAS S/O SONHAI MUDAHA , AGED ABOUT 47
Y E A R S , VILLAGE PANTI,P.S. AND TEH.
HANUMANA, (MADHYA PRADESH)
25. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH THE
COLLECTOR N (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI S. CHATURVEDI, ADVOCATE )
3
This appeal has come up for hearing on this day, the court passed the
following:
ORDER
It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the instant appeal.
Accordingly, appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(ARUN KUMAR SHARMA) JUDGE Vin** Signature Not Verified SAN Digitally signed by VINOD SHARMA Date: 2022.03.31 16:47:58 IST