Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Gurdev Singh Gill & Ors vs Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd & Ors on 17 November, 2014

Author: Harinder Singh Sidhu

Bench: Harinder Singh Sidhu

                                            CWP No. 23365 of 2014
                                                     -1-


                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
                                     CHANDIGARH


                                                      CWP No. 23365 of 2014(O&M)
                                                      Date of decision:17.11.2014


                   Gurdev Singh Gill and ors.                             ..... Petitioners

                                  Versus

                   The Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. and ors. .... Respondents

                                                --

CORAM:HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU

--

Present: Mr. J.S. Jaidka, Advocate for the petitioners.

--

HARINDER SINGH SIDHU,J The petitioner are either serving or retired employees of the respondent-Corporation and have worked or working on the post of Revenue Accountants and Divisional Accountants. Their grievance is that the post of Revenue Accountant is a promotional post from the post of Internal Auditor and, therefore, they are entitled to higher pay-scale than Internal Auditors.

The petitioners have submitted a representation (Annexure P-8) before the respondents regarding their claim.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states, that at this stage, the petitioners will be satisfied, if directions are issued to the respondents to decide the representation. DINESH KUMAR 2014.11.18 11:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CWP No. 23365 of 2014 -2-

In view of the above, without commenting on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioners dated 11.11.2014 (Annexure P-8) by passing a speaking order expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

( HARINDER SINGH SIDHU ) JUDGE 17.11.2014 dinesh DINESH KUMAR 2014.11.18 11:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh