Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court - Orders

Sahdeo Rai @ Sahdev Rai vs The State Of Bihar on 20 September, 2023

Author: Satyavrat Verma

Bench: Satyavrat Verma

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63422 of 2023
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-632 Year-2023 Thana- PATLIPUTRA District- Patna
                   ======================================================
                   Sahdeo Rai @ Sahdev Rai Son of Late Mahendra Rai R/o vill - Kurji Gate
                   No. 65, Near Kurji More, P.S. - Digha, Distt. - Patna
                                                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
              1.    The State of Bihar.
              2.   The Director General of Police, Gov. of Bihar
              3.   The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna Bihar
              4.   The Superintendent of Police, (Central Range) Patna Bihar
              5.   The Deputy Superintendent of Police ( Law and order) Patna Bihar
              6.    The Station House Officer-cum-Investigation officer Patliputra Thana Patna
                    Bihar
                                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                   ======================================================
                   Appearance :
                   For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Dipak Kumar, Advocate
                   For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP
                   ======================================================
                   CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                         ORAL ORDER

2    20-09-2023

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State along with learned counsel for the informant.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after some argument seeks permission to withdraw the quashing application with liberty to raise all issue in accordance with law in terms of Section 84 Cr.P.C.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. Accordingly, the quashing application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Prakash Narayan
U       T