Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 1]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Budh Singh And Others vs State Of Punjab And Another on 28 January, 2011

Author: Ritu Bahri

Bench: Ritu Bahri

CRM No. M-30711 of 2010
                                                                      -1-

        IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT
                   CHANDIGARH


                              CRM No. M-30711 of 2010 (O&M)
                              Date of Decision : 28.01.2011


Budh Singh and others

                                                   .......... petitioners
                              Versus

State of Punjab and another

                                                   ...... Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI


Present :   Ms.G.K. Mann, Advocate
            for the petitioners.

            Mr.Munish Kumar, AAG, Punjab.

            Mr. S.S. Tiwana, Advocate
            for respondent No.2.

                 ****

RITU BAHRI, J. (ORAL)

Present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing FIR No. 141dated 3.12.2009 under Sections 379, 427 IPC registered at Police Station Dehlon, District Ludhiana on the basis of compromise dated 8.2.2010 (Annexure P-2).

In compliance of the order dated 14.10.2010, report from the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Ludhiana has been received. Statements of complainant Jaswinder Singh, all the accused Budh Singh, Charan Singh and Deepa Singh and the witnesses namely Gurinder Singh, Hoshiar Singh and Paramjit Singh have been recorded. Complainant and Paramjit Singh Nambardar have been CRM No. M-30711 of 2010 -2- identified by Sh. Ajay Goyal, Advocate.

After recording the statement, the contents of the compromise are found to be genuine.

In view of the above report, the FIR No. 141 dated 3.12.2009 under Sections 379, 427 IPC registered at Police Station Dehlon, District Ludhiana is quashed with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom qua the petitioners.

The petition stands disposed of.




28.01.2011                                           (RITU BAHRI)
  'sp'                                                 JUDGE