Karnataka High Court
Sri Abdul Wajid S/O. Late Abdul Jayid ... vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its ... on 26 August, 2011
Author: B.V.Nagarathna
Bench: B.V.Nagarathna
-[-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 26™ DAY OF AUGUST. 2011 7 .
> BEFORE : ;
THE HON'BLE MRS, JUSTICE BLY. NAGARAI HINA'
W.P.NOs.497 |- "88/2609 (L A up A).
BETWEEN:
I,
APE"
SRI ABDUL WAJID 7
S/O. LATE ABDUL JAYID SAHEB..
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS . .
MBS WOOD INDUSTRIES
BH ROAD, TUMKUR ©
SRI. SIKANDAR . _
S/O SRLABIDUL RE? SUMAN SANE B
AGED ABOUT 5 4 YEARS | .
DADA PEERSAW MILL 0 |
BEHIND, OLD CHO POST OFFICE
Bu ROAD, TY IMKUR os
SRI. LE NKA' FARAIMAN JAPPA S/O DASAPPA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
(SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CI AIMED)
SEHIND OLD CHOUK POST OF FICE
Sp 1p BUR-ROAD, TUMKUR
~ SREB. GOVINDARAJU
_ 8/0 SRI. BC VENKATACHALASETTY
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
SRE SOMESWARA RICE MILL
DIABUR ROAD, TUMKUR
on SRI. PAPAIAH S/O LATE HARIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
(SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED)
BEFIND OLD CHOUK POST OFFICE
DIBBUR ROAD. TUMEUR
SRI, KUMBAIAH S/O KARIGIRAIAH
AGED ABOUT S85 YEARS
t.
ra
CRE Se CUE tee LS Re
Cee Ce ATES
es
9.
10.
im)
(SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIM ED}
BEHIND OLD CHOUK POST OFFICE
DIBBUR ROAD, TUMKUR
SRI KARIBASAPPA ae
35/O LATE THIMMAPPA @ JOOLAPPA 7
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS a
BEHIND OLD CHECK POST °
DIBBUR ROAD, TUMKUR
SRI SIDDALINGAIAH S/O LATE SIDPALAH |
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS...
(SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT: NOT CLAR 1E D)
BEHIND OLD CHECK PosTrio.. :
DIBBUR ROAD, TUMKUR
ORD KC. LAKSHMAIAH S/ O LAT E c HAL NINAIAH
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS .
(SENIOR. CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT on, AIMED}
C/O SRI. KARIBASAPPA 7
BEHIND GLD CHECK POST: .
DIBBUR.ROAD, TUMEUR: oF
SMT. PHIM: MAREA® WV {QO SRE CHIKKALLAIAH
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS:
(SENIOR CITIZEN BEN /EFIT NOT CLAIME 13}
BEHIND OLD CHECK POST
DIBBU R ROAD, TU UMIUR
. : SRI, MOE TAM Me AD JAFPFAR S/O LATE BUDEN SAHEB
- AGED ABGUT 50 YEARS
"Jd. SERVICE STATION
_ BEHIND OLD CHECK Post
_DIBBUR- ROAD, TUMKUR
SMT. SHIVAMMA W/O SRL NANDA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
_. BEHIND OLD CHECK postr
ry i B b UR ROA D
TUMBLER
SRE HAPEEZ MOHAMMAD AZAM
5/O LATE MOHAMMAD NAZEER
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
iSEINIOR CITIZEN LNERT?E NOT CLAIM nD)
MODERN ENGINEER ING? WORKS
tes
Ses Le conics niente a teen RIC Re
Bg Se SG SG SUS Tes Scene nes
oo AND:
"1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BEHIND OLD CHECK POST. DIBBUR ROAD
TUMEUR
l4. SRL S.N. DHRUVARAJ S/O S.NARAYANA SEPPY .~ >
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS oe
NAMA SANJEEVA SETTY & SONS
STATIONERY SHOP, MANDIPET
TUMRUR 0000
i5. SMT. S. SUMITHRA W/O SRI. M AN JU NATHASW AMY.
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS me
(SENTOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOY Ci LAU MED) .
I MAIN, TI CROSS, ASHOKANAGAR
TUMEUR
16. SMT. GANGAMMA W /¢ 3 LAT E SID ae
AGED ABOUT 50 YHARS oS ne
AGRAHARA, TUMKUR™ 7
iv. SMT. Sy AHIRA BAN U Ww {© SRL MU USTAQ AHMED
AGED ABOUT 59 YE ARS» a
SMS ENGINIC ERING WORKS |
BEHIND. OLD CHOUK POST OFFICE
DIBBU RRO: AD. TUMKUR :
iS SRL TC. ESWARAPPA S/O CHANDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
NEXT TO SMS ENGINEERING WORKS
oo : "BEHIND OLD-CHOUK POST OFFICE
"DIBBUR-ROAD, TUMKUR
- me .. PETITIONERS
(by Sint: S:THEJASHWINI, ADV.)
REP BY ITS SECRETARY
TO REVENUE DEPARTMENT
VISASA SOUDHA
DANGALORE
2, THiS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
TU MKU AR DIST RICT. TUMKUR
Pe
ae
Lael
THE ASSISTANT LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER AND
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ,
TUMEUR SUB-DIVISION, TUMBUR
4. "THE TUMIBUIK URBAN DEVELOPMENT AU THORITY
TUMBUR, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER
a (on RE spe ONDE N TS
(By sricHoVENBATESH DODDERL, AGE. FOR et 'r0 R3,
SREP. VIVEBANANDA, ADV. FOR SRI. P S Ma Neb JNA cE, i
ADV. FOR R4)
THESE WPs ARE FILED: PRAYING TO QUASH THE
IMPUGNED PREMININARY NOTIFICATION -- DT,7.7.08.
GAZETTED ON 28.8.08,. [ANN-B] ISSUED BY THE R2,
DEPUTY COMMISSIONE, UME RI 2 1ST. EU MKUR.
These Petitions con: ing on for (Orders this day, the
court madé the 'Following:
Counsel foc respondent has filed a memo stating thal
- the : petitioners nave challenged the preliminary notification os dated 7.2 7.2908 issued by the second respondent proposing lo 0 acquire 'certain lands on Turnkur Amanikere for the
-. formation of Outer Ring Road by a subsequent notification dated 24.7.2010 after the said preliminary notification has Under tne cir bee . sea¢perusliort seres ches pe pugees i fo on been carcelled. Ur TCLITTISEATICCS, 11 iS Shares the writ petition wouid not survive for consideration.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petidioners and learned counsel for the respondents.
3. Having regard to the fact thatthe. ~ iipugned | respondent authority, nothing further "stitvives for. consideration in these writ pelitions. "Hence, 'the writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous. ae