Supreme Court - Daily Orders
Pt. Bara Daya Energi vs Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. ... on 29 May, 2023
Bench: Dipankar Datta, Pankaj Mithal
ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.6 SECTION IX
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).10610/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03-05-2023
in WPL No.12123/2023 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At
Bombay)
PT. BARA DAYA ENERGI Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
MAHARASHTRA STATE POWER GENERATION CO. LTD.
THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN & ORS. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.103904/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING
C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.103905/2023-PERMISSION TO
FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
LIST NEXT WEEK AS PER ORAL MM...4/804 DATED 23.05.2023
IA No. 103904/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT
IA No. 103905/2023 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES) Date : 29-05-2023 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Namit Suri, AOR Mr. Sameer Rohatagi, Adv.
Mr. Rameezuddin Raja, Adv. Ms. Purnima Singh, Adv.
Ms. Surabhi Sinha, Adv.
Mr. kartikey Singh, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Karunakar Mahalik, AOR Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Dhruv Sharma, Adv.
Signature Not VerifiedDr. Ravindra Chingale, Adv.
Digitally signed by Deepak Singh Date: 2023.05.29Mr. Prabhas Bajaj, Adv.
17:34:02 IST Reason: Mr. Rangasaran Mohan, Adv.
Ms. Akshita Chawla, Adv.
1Mr. Ravindra Sadanand Chingale, AOR M/S. Karanjawala & Co., AOR Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Ms. Ruby Singh Ahuja, Adv.
Ms. Deepti Sarin, Adv.
Mr. Ishan Gaur, Adv.
Ms. Megha Dugar, Adv.
Mr. S. Niranjan Reddy, Sr. Adv. Mr. Malak Manish Bhatt, AOR Ms. Neeha Nagpal, Adv.
Mr. Siddharth Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Nithin Saravanan, Adv. Ms. Arunima Singh, Adv.
Ms. Manicka Priya S., Adv.
Mr. Karunakar Mahalik, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
1. We are satisfied that the impugned judgment and order of the High Court of Bombay dismissing the writ petition of the Petitioner does not call for any interference in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the Special Leave Petition is dismissed.
2. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(DEEPAK JOSHI) (DIPTI KHURANA) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 2