Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Allahabad High Court

M/S Nabeel Prints Bhandar And Another vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 25 September, 2019

Bench: Pankaj Mithal, Saral Srivastava





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 29
 

 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27030 of 2019
 

 
Petitioner :- M/S Nabeel Prints Bhandar And Another
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Praneet Kumar Srivastava
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
 
And 
 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27042 of 2019
 

 
Petitioner :- M/S Ahmed Prints And Another
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Praneet Kumar Srivastava
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Avinash Jaiswal
 
And 
 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27046 of 2019
 

 
Petitioner :- M/S Pilkhuwa Handlooms And Another
 
Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Praneet Kumar Srivastava
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Avinash Jaiswal
 
And
 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27055 of 2019
 

 
Petitioner :- M/S Madina Prints And Another
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Praneet Kumar Srivastava
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Avinash Jaiswal
 

 

 
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J.
 

Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.

Heard Sri Praneet Kumar Srivastava holding brief of Sri Santosh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing counsel and Sri Avinash Jaiswal for the Corporation Bank.

In all the above writ petitions the challenge is to the recovery citations whereby Bank dues are sought to be recovered as arrears of land revenue.

The argument of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the aforesaid recoveries are in respect of commercial transactions and not in respect of any loan granted under any State Sponsored Scheme. Therefore, the amounts can not be recovered as arrears of land revenue. In support, he has placed reliance upon a Full Bench decision in the case Suresh Chandra Gupta and others Vs. Collector, Kanpur Nagar AIR 2005 Allahabad 320.

Learned counsel for the Bank was granted time to seek instructions in the matter if the amounts are recoverable as arrears of land revenue.

On instructions he submits that the amounts sought to be recovered can not actually be recovered as arrears of land revenue and that the matter is squarely covered by the aforesaid Full Bench.

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the impugned recovery citations each dated 22.7.2019 are hereby quashed and the writ petitions are allowed with liberty to the Bank to recover the amounts by means of any other mode which may be open in law.

The writ petitions are allowed.

Order Date :- 25.9.2019 SKS