Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

M/S. J.R.B Enterprises vs The Deputy Commissioner on 24 January, 2013

Author: Antony Dominic

Bench: Antony Dominic

       

  

  

 
 
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                            PRESENT:

                        THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC

            TUESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013/7TH PHALGUNA 1934

                                   WP(C).No. 4507 of 2013 (K)
                                       --------------------------
PETITIONER :
---------------------

            M/S. J.R.B ENTERPRISES,
            REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER N.U.JOSEPH
            S/O.ULAHANNAN, AGED 58 YEARS, NELLIPALLY HOUSE,
            CHOODIKOTTA, MAHE, PIN-673310,
            UNION TERRITORY OF PUNDUCHERRY.

            BY ADV. SRI. R. SURENDRAN

RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------

        1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
            COMMERCIAL TAXES, PALAKKAD-678001.

        2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
            COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOZHIKODE-673001.

        3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
            COMMERCIAL TAXES, KANNUR-670001.

        4. THE SALES TAX INSPECTOR
            SALES TAX CHECK POST, GOPALAPURAM
            PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678555.

        5. THE SALES TAX INSPECTOR
            SALES TAX CHECK POST, WALAYAR
            PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678624.

        6. THE SALES TAX INSPECTOR
            SALES TAX CHECK POST, MUTHANGA
            WAYANAD DISTRICT-678624.

        7. STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT
            TAXES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

            R1 TO R7 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SMT. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN


            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
            ON 26-02-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
            FOLLOWING:

Mn
                                                                      ...2/-

WP(C).No. 4507 of 2013 (K)


                                 APPENDIX

PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :

EXHIBIT P1:  TRUE COPY OF PARTNERSHIP DEED

EXHIBIT P2:  TRUE COPY OF REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE DATED 24.1.2013,
             ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER UNDER THE CENTRAL SALES TAX ACT.

EXHIBIT P3:  TRUE COPY OF REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE DATED 24.1.2013
             ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER UNDER THE PUDUCHERRY VALUE
             ADDED TAX ACT.

EXHIBIT P4:  TRUE COPY OF MUNICIPAL LICENCE DATED 26.9.2012 ISSUED TO
             PETITIONER

EXHIBIT P5:  TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 24.5.2012 IN WP(C) NO.8630 OF
             2012 ON THE FILE OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS      :    NIL

                                                             //TRUE COPY//



                                                            P.S. TO JUDGE

Mn



                    ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                 -------------------------------------------
                   W.P(C).No.4507 of 2013
                 -------------------------------------------
           Dated this the 26th day of February, 2013

                             JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a dealer of live chicken in Mahe and is a registered dealer under the Puducherry VAT Act. In this writ petition, the prayer is that the transit pass enabling him to transport live chicken through the State of Kerala should be issued by the respondents without any delay. An issue similar to the one raised by the petitioner was considered by this Court in W.P(C).No.8630/12 and that writ petition was disposed of by Ext.P5 judgment rendered on 24.5.2012. Since the facts are exactly similar, there is no reason to decline the same relief to the petitioner. In such circumstances, it is directed that if the petitioner is a registered dealer and the transportation of live chicken is also legitimate, transit pass shall be issued to him without delay. The writ petition is disposed of with this direction.

Sd/-

ANTONY DOMINIC Judge kkb.26/2.