Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 10, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Scientific Compounds And vs Hanuman Cottage Industry on 5 August, 2021

Author: R.Subramanian

Bench: R.Subramanian

                                                                                  C.S.No.833 of 2000

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                 DATED: 05.08.2021
                                                     CORAM:
                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
                                                 C.S.No.833 of 2000

                     1.Scientific Compounds and
                       Processes Private Ltd.,
                       Citadel Building Office No.2,
                       117, Dr.Radha Krishanan Road,
                       Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004.
                       Represented by its Director,
                       Mr.G.Parimalazhagan

                     2.ECOF Detergents Private Ltd.,
                       28 B, Sardar Patel Road, Guindy,
                       Chennai – 600 032.
                       Represented by its Business Manager,
                       Mr.G.Parimalazhagan                                            ...Plaintiffs

                                                         Vs.

                     Hanuman Cottage Industry,
                     37/1, 2nd Main Road,
                     New Tharagupet,
                     Bangalore – 52.                                                ...Defendant


                     Prayer: Plaint filed under Order VII, Rule 1 of C.P.C., and Order IV Rule 1
                     of the Original Side rules r/w. Sections 27, 28, 29, 105 & 106 of the Trade
                     and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 and Sections 51, 55, 62 and 63 of the
                     Copyright Act, 1957, praying as follows:-

                     1/5


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                       C.S.No.833 of 2000

                                   a) a permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, by itself, its
                     partners / proprietors, heirs, legal representatives, successors-in-business,
                     assigns, servants, agents, distributors, representatives or any of them from in
                     any manner infringing the Plaintiffs' registered trademark 'SABENA' by use
                     of trademark 'SUBEENA' or any mark which is similar to Plaintiffs'
                     trademark ' SABENA' in respect of cleaning powder.
                                   b) a permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, by itself, its
                     partners / proprietors, heirs, legal representatives, successors-in-business,
                     assigns, servants, agents, distributors, representatives or any of them from
                     passing off and enabling others to pass off the Defendant's cleaning powder
                     as and for Plaintiffs' cleaning powder by use of trademark 'SUBEENA' and
                     'SUBEENA' polythene pouch or any other mark and / or pouch which is a
                     identical or similar to Plaintiffs' trademark ' SABENA' and 'SABENA'
                     polythene pouch or in any other manner whatsoever;
                                   c) a permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, by itself, its
                     partners / proprietors, heirs, legal representatives, successors-in-business,
                     assigns, servants, agents, distributors, representatives or any of them from in
                     any manner infringing the Plaintiffs' artistic work 'SABENA' polythene
                     pouch by use of 'SUBEENA' polythene pouch or any other pouch which is a
                     substantial reproduction of Plaintiffs' artistic work 'SABENA' polythene
                     pouch;
                                   d) the Defendant be ordered to surrender to Plaintiffs for
                     destruction all goods, products, polythene pouches, blocks, dyes, screen
                     prints, brochures, labels, pamphlets, advertising materials and other

                     2/5


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                         C.S.No.833 of 2000

                     materials bearing the trademark 'SUBEENA' and artistic work 'SUBEENA'
                     polythene pouch or any other trademark and / or artistic work which is
                     identical or similar to Plaintiffs' trademark 'SABENA' and artistic work
                     'SABENA' polythene pouch;
                                   e) a preliminary decree to be passed in favour of the Plaintiffs
                     directing the Defendant to render account of profits made by use of
                     trademark 'SUBEENA' and artistic work of 'SUBEENA' polythene pouch
                     from the date of commitment of sale of goods and a final decree be passed
                     in favour of the Plaintiffs for the amount of profits thus to have been made
                     by the Defendant after the letter have rendered accounts.
                                   f) a decree for Rs.10,05,000/- as damages in favour of the
                     Plaintiffs for the acts of infringement of trademark, infringement of
                     Copyright and passing off committed by the Defendant.
                                   g) for the costs of the suit.


                                              For Plaintiffs       : Mr.Rahul M Shankar for
                                                                            Mr.C.S.Gopalakrishnan
                                              For Defendant        : Mr.K.Chandrasekar


                                                           JUDGMENT

Mr.Rahul M Shankar, learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff would submit that he has instructions to withdraw the suit, since the products of the defendant are no longer in the market.

3/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.833 of 2000

2.Recording the said statement, this suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Liberty is reserved to the plaintiffs to approach the Court, if there is a future cause of action.

05.08.2021 kkn Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking List of witness and documents filed on the side of the plaintiffs:

Nil List of witness and documents filed on the side of the defendant:
Nil 05.08.2021 kkn 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.S.No.833 of 2000 R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

KKN C.S.No.833 of 2000 05.08.2021 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/