Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

M/S. Bla-Bkb (Jv) vs The State Of West Bengal & Anr on 19 September, 2024

 M/L 362                 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
19.09.2024              CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
  sb
   Ct 5                         APPELLATE SIDE
                                 WPA 10016 of 2024

                                   M/s. BLA-BKB (JV)
                                          Versus
                             The State of West Bengal & Anr.

                         Mr. Kartik Kurmy
                         Ms. Priya Paul
                                             ... For the petitioner.


                         Mr. Anirban Ray, Ld. GP,
                         Mr. T. M. Siddiqui
                         Mr. Tanoy Chakraborty
                         Mr. Saptak Sanyal
                                     ... For the State




             1. Challenging, inter alia, the order passed under Section

                73(9) of the WBGST/CGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter

                referred to as the "said Act") dated 28th December,

                2023, for the tax period July 2017 to March, 2018, the

                instant writ petition has been filed.


             2. Although the challenge in the writ petition is with

                regard to the jurisdictional issue, Mr. Kurmy, learned

                advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner after

                arguing the matter for some time would seek leave to

                challenge the aforesaid order before the appellate

                authority under Section 107 of the said Act.


             3. Mr. Siddiqui, learned Additional Government Pleader

                appearing on behalf of the respondents would submit

that this matter can be appropriately decided by the appellate authority.

2

4. Having heard the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties and considering the fact that the Appellate Tribunal, is yet to be constituted, I am of the view that the petitioner should be permitted to approach the appellate authority. Having regard to the alternative remedy available and the stand taken by the petitioner, it will only be appropriate to have the issue raised herein be adjudicated by the appellate authority at the first instance.

5. The appellate authority under Section 107 of the said Act shall hear out and dispose of the appeal provided the same is filed within two weeks from the date of receipt of the server copy of this order, subject to compliance of other formalities by the petitioner.

6. In the event, such appeal is filed, the appellate authority, having regard to the peculiar facts of the case shall hear out and dispose of the appeal on merit as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 12 weeks from the date of filing such appeal.

7. With the above observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of.

Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be made available to the parties upon compliance of requisite formalities.

(Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.) 3