Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Pepsu Road Transport Corporation vs Satinder Kaur And Others on 2 April, 2014

Author: K. Kannan

Bench: K. Kannan

             FAO No.1366 of 2000                                       -1-

                IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                                       CHANDIGARH

                                                      FAO No.1366 of 2000
                                                      Date of Decision. 02.04.2014

             Pepsu Road Transport Corporation                          ......Appellant

                                                   Versus

             Satinder Kaur and others                                  ......Respondents

             Present:          None.

             CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN

             1.  Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the
                 judgment ?
             2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ?
             3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
                                              -.-
             K. KANNAN J. (ORAL)

1. The original papers have been burnt in a fire accident that took place on 31.01.2011. A Committee was constituted and papers have been reconstructed with the assistance of the counsel who supplied the copies. Wherever information was available regarding the status of service and counsel were appearing, the cause list gave those details and cases were taken up for hearing. In respect of cases where there was no counsel on record and papers could not be reconstructed, notice had been sent to parties as found in the court registers. In respect of some cases, persons have responded and in many cases nobody has responded.

2. In the above case, the papers have been reconstructed and the cause list gives names of counsel of both sides. There is no representation for either side. The appeal is dismissed for default of appearance and non prosecution.

Kamboj Pankaj Kumar 2014.04.04 13:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh FAO No.1366 of 2000 -2-

3. Copy of the order may be dispatched to the parties/counsel whose name appear in the cause list.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE April 02, 2014 Pankaj* Kamboj Pankaj Kumar 2014.04.04 13:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh