Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Birbal Kumar Nishad vs The State Of Chhattisgarh on 30 June, 2021

Bench: Ashok Bhushan, Vineet Saran, M.R. Shah

     ITEM NO.13                     Court 6 (Video Conferencing)                 SECTION II-C

                                    S U P R E M E C O U R T O F         I N D I A
                                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                           SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No.7772/2021

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-12-2019
     in CRA No.1138/2001 passed by the High Court of Chhatisgarh at
     Bilaspur)

     BIRBAL KUMAR NISHAD                                                        Petitioner(s)
                                                        VERSUS

     THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH                                                  Respondent(s)

     (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.67329/2021-CONDONATION OF DELAY
     IN FILING and IA No.67328/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA
     No.67334/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT )

     Date : 30-06-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

     For Petitioner(s)                     Mr. Sameer Shrivastava, AOR
                                           Mr. Sourabh Sahu, Adv.
                                           Mrs. Isha Jajodia, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)

                              UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                 O R D E R

Delay condoned.

In the facts of the case, we are not inclined to entertain this Special leave Petition. The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed.

However, we take exception to the judgment of the Sessions Judge where the name of victim is mentioned. It is well established that in cases like the present one, the name of the victim is not to be mentioned in any proceeding. We are of the view that all the subordinate courts shall be careful in future Signature Not Verified while dealing with such cases.

Digitally signed by RASHI GUPTA Date: 2021.07.01 16:34:58 IST

Reason: Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

                         (RASHMI DHYANI)                                 (RENU KAPOOR)
                           COURT MASTER                                  BRANCH OFFICER