Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Mrnutan Singh Thakur vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. on 9 October, 2014

                   Central Information Commission
Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New 
                                Delhi­110066
                             website­cic.gov.in

                  Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2013/002413/MP
  
Appellant                          :    Shri Nutan Singh 
Thakur, Korba
Public Authority         :    New India Assurance Co. Ltd., 
Bhopal/Mumbai

Date of Hearing               :     9 October 2014 
Date of Decision              :     9 October 2014     

Present          :
Appellant                                   : 
                          Present through VC              
Respondent                               :            Shri S.K. 
                          Gunjal, Regional Manager, Bhopal
  
                          Shri Renjit Gangadharan, DGM/FAA, 
                          Shri S.K. Das
  
                          Manager, Ms. Ranjana Nigot, Asstt. 
                          Manager at 
  
                          Mumbai through VC

                                   ORDER

1. The   appellant,   Nutan   Singh   Thakur   submitted   RTI  application   dated   20   April   2013   before   the   Central   Public  Information   Officer   (CPIO),   New   India   Assurance   Co.   Ltd.,  Bhopal   seeking   information   regarding   details   of   claim   of  vehicle No. CG 12 R 1570 pertaining to Shri Bhuneshwar Singh  etc., through a total of 2 points.  

2. Vide reply dated 03 May 2013, CPIO denied information by  invoking   the   provisions   of   Section   8(1)(j)   of   the   RTI   Act  being   third   party   information.   Not   satisfied   by   the   CPIO's  reply, the appellant preferred an appeal dated 05 June 2013 to  the first appellate authority (FAA) alleging that he had been  wrongly   denied   the   information   by   the   CPIO   concerned.   Vide  order   dated   01   July   2013,   FAA   upheld   the   decision   of   CPIO  stating that existence of any public activity or interest is  the   condition   to   Section   11   and   this   condition   ought   to  precede   any   contemplation   of   disclosure   (by   CPIO)   of  information coming under Section 8(1)(j)

CIC/DS/A/2013/002413/MP 1

3.     Dissatisfied with the response of the public authority,  the appellant preferred appeal before the Commission.

4. The   matter   was   heard   by   the   Commission.     The   appellant  stated   that   Shri   Bhuneshwar   Singh   has   given   no   objection   in  providing   information   to   the   him   and   the   CPIO   had   wrongly  denied information by quoting Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act.  The   appellant   further   stated   that   the   CPIO   has   not   followed  the provisions of Section 11 of the RTI Act. The respondents  stated   that   the   signatures   of   Shri   Bhuneshwar   Singh   did   not  tally in the NOC provided by the appellant hence information  was   denied   to   the   appellant   being   third   party   information.  Moreover, the appellant had not established any larger public  interest   which   warrants   disclosure   of   such   information.   The  respondents referred to the decision of High Court of Delhi in  the matter of Arvind  Kejriwal  Vs. Union of India in LPA No.  719/2010 decided on 30.9.2011  which deals with the procedure  under   Section   11     and   mentions   that   there   should   be  overwhelming public interest to follow procedure of Rule 11 of  the RTI Act. 

5. The   Commission   accepts   the   submissions   made   by   the  respondents.   The   information   as   sought   for   by   the   appellant  related to personal information of third party, the disclosure  of   which   has   no   relationship   to   any   public   activity   or  interest   and   is   therefore   exempt   under   the   provisions   of  Section 8(1) (j) of the RTI Act, 2005. The decision of CPIO/  FAA is upheld. The appeal is disposed of.

(Manjula Prasher)  Information Commissioner  Authenticated true copy:

(T.K. Mohapatra) Dy. Secretary & Dy. Registrar Ph. No. 011­26105027 Address of the parties:
Shri Nutan Singh Thakur, Ward No. 03, Rajput Chowk,  Purani Basti, Korba­495678 CIC/DS/A/2013/002413/MP 2 The Regional Manager/CPIO, The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Bhopal Regional Office, Paryavas Bhawan, Block No. 3, 2nd Floor, Area Hills, Bhopal­462011.
The DGM/FAA, The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Regd. & Head Office, New India Assurance Bldg., 87, M.G. Road, Fort, Mumbai­400001.
CIC/DS/A/2013/002413/MP       3