Kerala High Court
Unknown vs By Advs.Sri.Augustine Joseph on 7 March, 2012
Author: Pius C.Kuriakose
Bench: Pius C.Kuriakose, C.T.Ravikumar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF MARCH 2012/17TH PHALGUNA 1933
LA.App..No. 128 of 2012 ()
---------------------------------------
LAR.NO.201/2009 of III ADDL.SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM
APPELLANT/CLAIMANT
---------------------------------
LISSY, W/O.ANTONY, MACHUVEETTIL HOUSE,
CHERANELLOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT,
NOW RESIDING AT MODEL ENGINEERING COLLEGE ROAD,
HOUSE NO.111/376, KAIRALI LANE JUNCTION,
THRIKKAKARA P.O., KOCHI-682021.
BY ADVS.SRI.AUGUSTINE JOSEPH
SRI.S.DILEEP
SRI.K.S.ROCKEY
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
-----------------------------------------
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL
TAHSILDAR (LAND ACQUISITION),
INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER TRANSHIPMENT TERMINAL,
VALLARPADOM, ELOOR - 682031.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.R.SYAMKUMAR
THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
07-03-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
MG
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE &
C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.
=====================
L.A.A. NO. 128 OF 2012
=====================
Dated this the 7th day of March 2012
JUDGMENT
Pius C.Kuriakose,J.
The claimant is the appellant. Her property in Mulavukad village was acquired for providing NH Connectivity road to ICTT Vallarpadam. The Land Acquisition Officer awarded the land value at the rate of Rs.12,852/-- per Are. The Reference Court under the impugned judgment has refixed the land value at Rs.73,455/- per Are. According to the claimant, the land value presently refixed by the Reference Court is inadequate.
2. Shri C.R.Syam Kumar, learned Senior Government Pleader points out that the impugned award suffers from at least one infirmity. According to him, the impugned award has been passed without notice to the Requisitioning Authority, the Cochin LALA 128/2012 2 Port Trust. We are also of the view that as the Requisitioning Authority, Cochin Port Trust was not made a party by the Reference Court to the proceedings, the impugned award has to be set aside. On that reason we set aside the impugned award and remand L.A.R.No.201/2009 to the IIIrd Additional Sub Court, Ernakulam. The learned IIIrd Additional Subordinate Judge is directed to implead the Cochin Port Trust as an additional party in the L.A.R.case and issue notice to them. The learned III Additional Subordinate Judge will pass a revised award after affording opportunity to all parties including the newly impleaded additional party to adduce whatever further evidence they want to for substantiating their rival contentions. The revised award will be passed on the basis of the entire evidence comes on record. The learned IIIrd Additional Subordinate Judge will do whatever is necessary in compliance with the directions herein above at the earliest and at any rate within three months of reopening the court after mid-summer LALA 128/2012 3 vacation. As we notice some laches on the part of the appellant also in not pointing out this aspect of the matter to the learned Subordinate Judge, we are not inclined to refund court fee presently remitted in full. The Registry will refund only 90% of the court fee presently remitted (Rs.58,700/-) to the appellant.
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,
JUDGE
C.T. RAVIKUMAR,
ks. JUDGE