Patna High Court - Orders
Ram Prasanan Ojha & Ors. vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 13 March, 2015
Author: Gopal Prasad
Bench: Gopal Prasad
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41822 of 2012 (2) dt.13-03-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.41822 of 2012
======================================================
1. Ram Prasanan Ojha S/O Late Balajee Ojha R/O Village - Indrath Khurd,
Post Office Kastar Mahadev, P.S. Bikramganj, Distt. - Rohtas
2. Shailesh Kumar Ojha @ Santosh Ojha S/O Ram Prasanan Ojha R/O
Village - Indrath Khurd, Post Office Kastar Mahadev, P.S. Bikramganj,
Distt. - Rohtas
3. Shail Kumari Devi W/O Ram Prasanan Ojha R/O Village - Indrath
Khurd, Post Office Kastar Mahadev, P.S. Bikramganj, Distt. - Rohtas
4. Lakhan Ojha S/O Ram Prasanan Ojha R/O Village - Indrath Khurd, Post
Office Kastar Mahadev, P.S. Bikramganj, Distt. - Rohtas
5. Chutur Kumar @ Meena Kumari D/O Ram Prasanan Ojha R/O Village -
Indrath Khurd, Post Office Kastar Mahadev, P.S. Bikramganj, Distt. -
Rohtas
6. Thakur Ojha @ Thakur Jee Ojha S/O Late Balajee Ojha R/O Village -
Indrath Khurd, Post Office Kastar Mahadev, P.S. Bikramganj, Distt. -
Rohtas
7. Sheojee Ojha S/O Late Balajee Ojha R/O Village - Indrath Khurd, Post
Office Kastar Mahadev, P.S. Bikramganj, Distt. - Rohtas
8. Dinesh Kumar Ojha S/O Sheojee Ojha R/O Village - Indrath Khurd, Post
Office Kastar Mahadev, P.S. Bikramganj, Distt. - Rohtas
9. Ramesh Kumar Ojha Son Of Sheojee Ojha R/O Village - Indrath Khurd,
Post Office Kastar Mahadev, P.S. Bikramganj, Distt. - Rohtas
.... .... Petitioners.
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. Manna Devi Wife of Rammurat Tiwary Resident of Village and Post
Office Dharupur, P.S. Bikramganj, Distt. Rohtas
.... .... Opposite Parties.
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Shankar Pandey
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Subhash Chandra Mishra(Ap
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
2 13-03-2015Learned counsel for the petitioner prayed to withdraw this case.
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, the case is dismissed as withdrawn. m.p. (Gopal Prasad, J) U