Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

M/S Ranjeet Engineering (P) Limited vs Sri Mukul Bhargav on 22 March, 2017

                           -1-
                                      WP No.38160/2013



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

       DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF MARCH 2017

                         BEFORE

        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH

       WRIT PETITION NO.38160/2013 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

M/S RANJEET ENGINEERING (P) LIMITED
NO.157/18, ST. PATRICK'S COMPLEX
BRIGADE ROAD
BANGALORE - 560 025
REPRESENTED BY D.P.GUPTHA
GPA HOLDER OF ITS DIRECTOR
SMT. VIDYAVATHI GUPTA                     ... PETITIONER

(BY SRI SUHAS.P FOR SRI M.C.RAVI KUMAR, ADVOCATES)

AND:

1.     SRI MUKUL BHARGAV
       AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
       PARTNER OF M/S ROTO PACKAGING
       NO.79/80, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA
       3RD PHASE, BANGALORE - 560 058

2.     OM SHANKAR BHARGAV
       PARTNER OF M/S ROTO PACKAGING
       NO.79/80, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA
       3RD PHASE, BANGALORE - 560 058
       DIED ON 13.12.2012

3.     SRI G.S.GUPTA
       S/O LATE RANJIT SINGH
       AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS
       NO.26, MAGRATH ROAD
       ASHOKNAGAR
       BANGALORE - 560 005
                           -2-
                                     WP No.38160/2013


4.   M/S ROTO PACKAGING
     A PARTNERSHIP FIRM
     NO.79/80, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA
     3RD PHASE, BANGALORE - 560 058
     REPRESENTED BY RESPONDENT NO.1 & 2
     IT'S PARTNERS

5.   SMT. MADHURI BHARGAV
     AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
     W/O LATE OM SHANKAR BHARGHAVA
     NO.32955 E NIMROD STREET, SOLON
     OHIO -44139, USA

6.   SRI MANDEEP BHATGAVA
     AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
     S/O LATE OM SHANKAR BHARGHAVA
     NO.32955 E NIMROD STREET, SOLON
     OHIO-44139, USA

7.   SMT. PREETHI BHARGAVA
     AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
     D/O LATE OM SHANKAR BHARGHAVA
     #151 SALMON BROOK DRIVE
     GLASTONBURY, CT 06033, USA

     RESPONDENT NOS.5 TO 7 REPRESENTED BY
     GPA HOLDER SRI MUKUL BHARGAV
     THE RESPONDENT NO.1 HEREIN       ... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI M.S.RAGHAVENDRA PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR
    R1, R5, R6 & R7; R3 & R4 SERVED)

      THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE
THE ORDER DATED 30.07.2013 PASSED BY THE 3RD ADDL. CITY
CIVIL JUDGE (CCH-25) BANGALORE CITY IN OS.NO.4188/2002
ON INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.17 AT ANNEXURE-A &
SET ASIDE THE SAME BY QUASHING THE SAID ORDER.

     THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE
FOLLOWING:
                                 -3-
                                         WP No.38160/2013



                          ORDER

H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral):

1. This writ petition is by the plaintiff in the suit in O.S.No.4188/2002 and is directed against an interlocutory order dated 30.07.2013 whereby the legal representatives of deceased defendant No.2 were permitted to come on record as defendant Nos.2(a), 2(b) and 2(c).
2. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the record.
3. In my opinion, the impugned order does not suffer from any error of jurisdiction or cannot be said to have resulted in failure of justice to warrant interference under the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

Petition disposed of.

Sd/-

JUDGE LB