Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

B. Balaji vs Member Secretary on 8 April, 2019

Author: S.M.Subramaniam

Bench: S.M.Subramaniam

                                                            1

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED : 08.04.2019

                                                         CORAM

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

                                           W.P.Nos.33431 and 33433 of 2018
                                                        and
                                            WMP.Nos. 38797 38807 of 2018


                      B. Balaji                              ... Petitioner in W.P.No.33431 of 2018

                      K.Renuga                               ... Petitioner in W.P.No.33433 of 2018

                                                           -Vs-

                      1. Member Secretary,
                        Teachers Recruitment Board,
                         College Road,
                         Chennai – 600 006.

                      2. Secretary to Government,
                         School Education Department,
                         Fort St.George,
                         Chennai – 600 009.                         ... Respondents in both WPs.

                      PRAYER in W.P.No.33431 of 2018: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
                      Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to directing the respondents
                      to select and appoint the petitioner as Computer Instructor under “Backward
                      Class” category in terms of Recruitment Notification dated 13.10.2014.

                      PRAYER in W.P.No.33433 of 2018: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
                      Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to directing the respondents
                      to select and appoint the petitioner as Computer Instructor under “General
                      Turn” category in terms of Recruitment Notification dated 13.10.2014.




http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                              2


                                          For petitioner
                                           in both WPs.       : Mr. S.Mohammed Uduman

                                          For Respondents
                                          in both WPs         : Mr.C.Munusamy,
                                                              Special Government Pleader for R1
                                                                Mr.A.Rajaperumal
                                                              Additional Government Pleader for R2

                                                     COMMON ORDER

The relief sought for in these writ petitions is to direct the respondents to select and appoint the petitioners as Computer Instructor under “Backward Class” category in terms of Recruitment Notification dated 13.10.2014. Admittedly, the recruitment notification was issued in Advertisement No.07/2014, dated 13.10.2014.

2. The recruitment notification is for appointment to the post of Computer Instructor by way of direct recruitment for Government Higher Secondary Schools under the control of the Directorate of School Education, Chennai -6, now more than five years has lapsed from the date of recruitment notification.

3. The writ petitioners claims that they must be selected and appointed to the post of Computer Instructor. The writ petitioners were unsuccessful in the process of selection and constrained to file these writ petitions. http://www.judis.nic.in 3

4. Appointment can never be claimed as a matter of legal right. All appointments are to be made strictly in accordance with the Recruitment Rules in force. The process of selection can be challenged only on limited grounds. It is challenged only if the same is in violation of rules or any misappropriations or corrupt activities, then alone a writ would be entertained against the process of selection and not otherwise. Equal opportunity in public employment is the constitutional mandate. All the persons who are eligible must be provided with an opportunity to participate in the process of selection for the purpose of securing public employment.

5. Lakhs and Lakhs of youth of our great Nation are aspiring to secure public employment by participating in the open competitive process. This being the current situation, this Court is of an opinion that the writ petitioner has to participate in the process of selection and must secure appointment on merits and in accordance with law. Contrarily, the relief sought for in these writ petitions is absolutely misconceived and the writ petitioners has not established even a semblance of legal right, so as to consider the relief. http://www.judis.nic.in 4

6. Accordingly, these writ petitions stand dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

08.04.2019 Index : Yes Internet: Yes Speaking Order mp/pns To

1. The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, Chennai Range, Central Prisons, Puzhal, Chennai – 600 066.

2. The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prisons, Puzhal, Chennai – 600 066.

3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Chennai City – I, Detachment, Chennai – 600 028.

http://www.judis.nic.in 5 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

pns W.P.Nos.33431 and 33433 of 2018 and WMP.Nos. 38797 38807 of 2018 08.04.2019 http://www.judis.nic.in