Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 1]

Central Information Commission

Mr.Col T R Puri vs Ut Of Chandigarh on 9 August, 2012

                   Central Information Commission
Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New 
                                Delhi­110066
           Telefax:011­26180532 & 011­26107254 website­cic.gov.in

                   Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2012/000285  

Appellant /Complainant        :     Col. T.R. Puri, VSM (Retd.), 
Chandigarh     
Public Authority              :    Police Department, UT Chandigarh
                              (Shri Jaswant Singh, DSP/CPIO) 

Date of Hearing               :     09 August   2012 

Date of Decision              :     09 August 2012
  
Facts:­ 

1. Appellant submitted  RTI application dated 23 August 2011  before   the   CPIO,   Police   Head   Quarters,   Chandigarh   seeking  entire   court   proceedings   and   copies   of   the   Orders   passed   by  the   Hon'ble   court   in   the   case   of   Senior   Superintendent   of  Police   v.   Deepali   Puri   dated   4/5/2009   and   other   related  information.

2. Vide   CPIO's   reply   dated   9   November   2011,   CPIO   informed  the Appellant that the required information can be   obtained  from SHO/PS­19.

3. Not satisfied with the reply, Appellant preferred appeal  dated 18 October 2011, before the First Appellate Authority.

4. Vide FAA's Order dated 2 December 2011, FAA directed the  CPIO   to   provide   information   and   provide   opportunity   for   the  inspection of the documents to the Appellant. 

5. Being   aggrieved   and   not   being   satisfied   by   the   above  response   of   the   public   authority,   the   appellant   preferred  second appeal before the Commission.

6. Matter was heard today. Both parties, as above, appeared  in person and made submissions.

7. Appellant   submits   that   he   has   received   information   in  response   to   his   RTI   application   dated   23.8.2011   only   on  9.11.2011, which is beyond the period provided in the RTI Act

   Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2012/000285        CPIO   submits   that   he   received   the   RTI   application   on  14.10.2011 had provided the information on 9.11.2011 and that  there   was   no   delay   on   his   part   as   the   said   application   was  routed through several departments before being marked to him.  Appellant  also submits  that information sought  at point (iv)  has,   to   date,   not   been   furnished   to   him.     CPIO   states   that  this information is not held by him and is in fact, held by  CPIO, Police HQ.

Decision Notice

8. After   hearing   both   parties,   Commission   notes   that   CPIO,  PHQ transferred the RTI application to ADA/L on 5.9.2011 under  Sections   5(4)   and   5(5)   of   the   Act.     In   response,   ADA/L  forwarded   the   RTI   application   to   I/C,   CRU   on   8.9.2011,   who  further   transferred   the   application   to   Reader/SSP/Chandigarh.  The RTI application was again transferred to PS­19, who finally  provided   the   information   to   the   appellant.     The   Commission  notes that such handling of the RTI application is contrary to  the   letter   and   spirit   of   the   Act   and   it   is   for   the   public  authority   to   make   abundantly   clear   to   the   various  departments/sections as to who is the holder of the requested  information   and   not   toss   RTI   applications   to   several  departments/sections   before   it   reaches   its   final   destination,  thereby   losing   time   and   causing   harassment   to   the   applicant.  Therefore,   the   Public   Authority   is   directed   to   take   note   of  this   particular   case   and   using   this   as   a   test   case,   set   its  house   in   order   in   terms   of   maintenance   of   records   and   clear  identification of holders of information.  Further, it is noted  that no information in respect of point (iv) has, to date, been  provided to the appellant.   CPIO, PHQ is directed to provide  the requested information within three weeks of receipt of the  order.   Notice is also issued to the CPIO, PHQ to show cause  why   penalty   should   not   be   imposed   upon   him   for   not   having  provided information to the appellant in terms of Section 20(1)  of the Act.  He is directed to appear before the Commission for  personal hearing on 16.10.2012 at  11.45 PM at UT Guest House,  Sector­6, Chandigarh. 

 

   Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2012/000285        (Smt. Deepak Sandhu) Information Commissioner (DS) Authenticated true copy:

(T. K. Mohapatra) Dy. Secretary & Dy. Registrar Tel. No. 011­26105027 Copy to:­
1. Col. T.R. Puri, VSM (Retd.) House No. 49, Sector­4 Chandigarh
2. The CPIO Dy. Superintendent of Police Sub Division East , Sector­26 UT Chandigarh
3. The Appellate Authority Dy. Inspector Genl. of Police Police Head Quarters, 2nd. Floor Sector­9, UT Chandigarh
 4. The CPIO Police Headquarters,  Sector­9, UT Chandigarh
5. The Inspector General of Police Chandigarh Police , Sector­9 UT Chandigarh       Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2012/000285