Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 25]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

State Of M.P. vs Mathuralal on 27 March, 2023

Author: Subodh Abhyankar

Bench: Subodh Abhyankar

                                                              1
                                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                      AT INDORE
                                                          FA No. 582 of 2020
                                          (THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Vs MAHADEV)

                               FA/00584/2020, FA/00585/2020, FA/00586/2020, FA/00587/2020, FA/00571/2022,
                               FA/00572/2022, FA/00573/2022, FA/00576/2022, FA/00577/2022, FA/00578/2022,
                               FA/00579/2022, FA/00580/2022, FA/00581/2022, FA/00582/2022, FA/00587/2022,
                               FA/00896/2022, FA/00898/2022, FA/00901/2022, FA/00903/2022, FA/00904/2022,
                               FA/00905/2022, FA/00906/2022, FA/00907/2022, FA/00909/2022, FA/00913/2022,
                                                             FA/00916/2022
                           Dated : 27-03-2023
                                 None present for the private parties as the Advocates are abstaining from
                           Court work today.
                                 State through counsel.


                                 None has appeared for the private parties despite there being a specific
                           order passed by the Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jabalpur in
                           the case of [IN REFERENCE (SUO MOTO) VS. CHAIRMAN, STATE BAR
                           COUNCIL OF M.P. & OTHERS]                  in W.P. No.7295 of 2023 dated
                           24.03.2023, whereby the Division Bench of this Court, taking note of the
                           ongoing strike called by the State Bar Council of M.P., had issued certain
                           directions in para 18 of the order and the Advocates were directed to appear in
                           the court in their respective cases. Thus, today's absence of the advocates is in

                           clear violation of the said order. Thus, the Registry is directed to register a
                           separate Contempt Case against the concerned Advocates, who have filed
                           Vakalatnamas    on    behalf of the parties, petitioners/private respondents

concerned.

Let the Rule Nisi be issued to the concerned Advocates within two weeks time, returnable within further four weeks time.

Let a copy of this order be placed in the Contempt Petition to be registered by the Registry.

Signature Not Verified Signed by: PANKAJ PANDEY Signing time: 28-03-2023 11:56:28 2

(SUBODH ABHYANKAR) JUDGE Pankaj Signature Not Verified Signed by: PANKAJ PANDEY Signing time: 28-03-2023 11:56:28