Karnataka High Court
M/S Shrachi Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs State Of Karnataka on 29 July, 2008
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar
Bench: Mohan Shantanagoudar
:_.FTinan,cc ,
IN THE men coum" or KARNATAKA AT BA'{§3s§kii;Cj3f§E,.
cmao 11415 THE 29"' may 0? JULY} K
aemrzgtz
THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE .A_.AOl-lAI5's!~_~:l 'SHAN'*f.%§§I)§(§O§?i$A$i:"» *'
CEAL. no.21c22oo7
H W: . %
M15 Sh1'achiIn;E£ast1'uctai1'e i;w?.%.V-' 2: A '
(Earlier known as Sm, '
and Services] L_td,_,)' "
199.105, Meta c1:,.amher:.VTAf._ Y; ' "
10/1, Cunningham Road _ '
Bangalore, Rep byflits
Ravi Todi. ~ ..
Through his (}.PA..:H<3lde1".. _ V
.....
Legamficcr M] s. Shrachi T' ..Pctitionm:
('g§"Sfi_sumsia Ba;su.t<; Adv.,) ' Layout Police.
. Jfimuna V. Rae " Venkatesh Rao Aged about 37 years ' R/a No.36, 100 feet Read Banashankari, Bangalore.
3. Smt. Gectha Ravikumar Wjo Ravikumar Aged about 33 ymrs R /a No.54] 1 Water Tank Road V Bangalore Smith Taluk. '
4. G. Prabhakar _ S/0 late D. Gopal "
Aged about58 years" ._ V r .
Rla No.658', Maiiifieagd .
40th CI'(»SS,"j3F'" Blbcki A ' Jayaxmagax, :82 . ..Rcspondcnt.s
--.§§.~m;_. SF'_P., for State) «'1'*h'is* Cr} £a1'.."?.t$fiV.t:ic>11 is filed under Section.482 C.r_.P.C. aside the order passed by the 5*"
ASMM-, Béngalom in C.C.No.1146f2/2004 on 20-10-2005 ..aside"fl:e------arder passed by the Add}. SJ., and 190., V' «._;«*:'c4';V,_ Bangalore in Cr'.LRP No.712/2005 on 8--6«2006 flgjhelding xthe order of the 5"' ACMM., Bangalore in CC . 'No. i~3.:4'.Ey2/.f2{}£)4 on 20-10-2005 and to allow this petition by U g2antinigj'§mé=: interim custody of the vehicle Tata Indica car . V 4- Registration No. KA-05} Z-3920 under P. i"'...NQ.27[2(}04.
This Criminal Petition coming on for admiasion this " 'dafir, the Court made the following :
ORDER.
By the impugned order, the rejected the application filed by..th_:: _ custody of the vehicle. The "
the Sessions Court.
2. The is the Financier for the jflie accident. The V<"-'hifilfi. ti; released in favtmr of I'6S}V§0I1€3§§IitV "the Registration Certificate holder? ~f$r{_1;é1'._V by the Sessicms Court. does not find any error in the .A'.T'Vv-girder, inasmuch as the Registration Afiérfificafgé noisier igtfzntifled for custody of the vehizrle. .. The. 'F§,nancier has gggmdependent right to proceed A' the Registration Certfiiicate holder, if he/she ' defatfits in payment of money to the fmamzicr. \/5 dismissed *ck/ -
Hencc, the mtition fails and 4'