Bombay High Court
Naresh S/O Bhaskarrao Dhakate vs Schedule Tribe Caste Certificate ... on 13 October, 2025
Author: Mukulika Shrikant Jawalkar
Bench: Mukulika Shrikant Jawalkar
2025:BHC-NAG:10716-DB
1 11-WP No.3646.2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO. 2492 OF 2025
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3646 OF 2019
Naresh S/o Bhaskarrao Dhakate
..VS..
Schedule Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur and another
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders of directions
and Registrar's orders
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. M. V. Bute, Advocate for Petitioner.
Mr. A. S. Fulzele, Addl.G.P. for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, AND
RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ.
DATED : 13th OCTOBER, 2025
1. Heard learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner/applicant.
2. The Petitioner claiming to be belonging to "Halba" Scheduled Tribe got appointed as an 'Assistant Teacher' from the Scheduled Tribe category. The claim of the Petitioner was referred for deciding the validity. His claim was invalidated by the Respondent No.1 Caste Scrutiny Committed on 09/05/2019.
3. The Petitioner/applicant, on instructions, has not pressed the challenge to the order impugned, whereby the claim for issuance for the validity was rejected. However, considering the fact that the Petitioner/applicant was in 2 11-WP No.3646.2019 employment of the Respondent No.2 from 09/10/1994, he is claiming his services be absorbed on supernumerary post.
4. In this background, having regard to the existing policy reflected in various Government Resolutions, we permit the Petitioner/applicant to make a representation to Respondent No.2 - Zilla Parishad, for absorption of service on supernumerary post.
5. In case, if such request is made by the Petitioner/applicant to Respondent No.2, same be considered and decided within a period of six months from today. Till then no coercive action shall be taken.
6. Accordingly, the Civil Application as well as the Writ Petition are disposed of.
(RAJ D. WAKODE, J.) (SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J.) Kirtak Signed by: Mr. B.J. Kirtak Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 13/10/2025 18:44:56