Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Smt. Nirmala Nagnath Morbekar (Since ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 4 June, 2019

Bench: R. M. Borde, N. J. Jamadar

                                                        14-WP8274-15.DOC

                                                                          Santosh

     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                   CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                WRIT PETITION NO. 8274 OF 2015
                             WITH
               CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 360 OF 2018

Nagnath Shanivar Morbekar                                        ...Petitioner
                    Versus
The State of Maharashtra & ors.                            ...Respondents

Mr. Rishikesh Gherade, I/b Mr. H. G. Wakshe, for the Petitioner.

Dr. K. R. Kulkarni, AGP for Respondent no.1/State. Mr. A. M. Kulkarni, for Respondent nos.2 to 5.

                                       CORAM:      R. M. BORDE &
                                                   N. J. JAMADAR, JJ
                                       DATED:      4th JUNE, 2019
PC:-

1. It is informed by Mr. Kulkanri, the learned Counsel appearing for Respondent nos.2 to 5 - CIDCO that the Petitioner has already moved an application seeking regularization of the unauthorised construction and the application is pending for consideration. It is further stated that the application tendered by the Petitioner will be decided in accordance with the provisions of law expeditiously.

2. In the circumstances, Respondent no.2 - CIDCO to take decision on the application tendered by the Petitioner for regularization of the unauthorised construction in 1/2 ::: Uploaded on - 10/06/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 14/07/2019 07:04:16 ::: 14-WP8274-15.DOC accordance with the provisions of law as expeditiously as possible, preferably within eight weeks from today.

3. The writ petition stands disposed of.

4. In view of disposal of the petition, the Civil Application does not survive and stands disposed of accordingly.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] [R. M. BORDE, J.] 2/2 ::: Uploaded on - 10/06/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 14/07/2019 07:04:16 :::