Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Mahimud A. Latif Qureshi vs The State Of Maharashtra on 19 January, 2021

Bench: Sadhana S. Jadhav, N.R. Borkar

                                                                                    7.APEAL217.2014.doc



            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                        CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                        CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 217 OF 2014

 Mahimud A. Latif Qureshi.                                      ... Appellant.
 V/s.
 State of Maharashtra                                           ... Respondent.
                                         -------------------
 Mr. Ujwal R. Agandsurve, advocate for appellant.
 Ms. M.H. Mhatre, APP for State.
                                        ---------------------
                                 CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV &
                                         N.R. BORKAR, JJ.

DATE : JANUARY 19, 2021.

P.C. 1 Heard the learned Counsel Mr. Agandsurve for the appellant.

2 The appellant herein is convicted for the offence punishable under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code by the learned Sessions Judge, Solapur vide Judgment and order dated 6/2/2014 and sentenced to suffer life imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs. 10,000/- I.d. to suffer R.I. for 6 months. The appellant herein is also convicted for the offence punishable under section 452 of the Indian Penal Code Talwalkar 1 of 4 ::: Uploaded on - 19/01/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 08/02/2021 05:42:49 :::

7.APEAL217.2014.doc and sentenced to suffer R.I. for one year and to pay Rs. 3,000/- I.d. to suffer simple imprisonment for two months.

3 The evidence of the witnesses would indicate that P.W. 1, P.W. 7 and P.W. 8 had seen the accused leaving the room of the deceased Rahiman alongwith knife. Soon thereafter, Rahiman was found to have sustained 16 injuries and had ultimately, succumbed to the said injuries on the same day i.e. on 1/2/2011. 4 The evidence of P.W. 12 Mohd. Shaikh who was the incharge of Sadar Bazar Police Station on 1/2/2011 shows that on 1/2/2011 present appellant had been to the police station alongwith knife. The said knife was seized. On 1/2/2011 itself P.W. 1 Arifa had lodged a report at the police station alleging therein that on that day in the morning, the appellant herein, who was suspecting that Rahiman was in illicit relationship with his wife, has caused injuries to Rahiman and that Rahiman had succumbed to the said injuries. 5 In the course of hearing, learned Counsel for the appellant has drawn attention of this Court to the substantive evidence of the defence witness No. 1 Dr. Nitin Nagnath Abhiwant, who was working Talwalkar 2 of 4 ::: Uploaded on - 19/01/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 08/02/2021 05:42:49 :::

7.APEAL217.2014.doc as Assistant Professor of Psychiatric Department of Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Sarvopachar Rugnalaya, Solapur since November, 2009. The witness has stated that the appellant was referred to him in the year 2010. The patient was brought to the hospital with complaints of his suspicious nature, delusions, his aggressiveness and destructive mind. That upon examining the patient, defence witness No. 1 had given an opinion that there was substance in the complaints and that the patient was suffering from paranoid schizophrenia and hence, he was given four electric shock. The appellant was treated as indoor patient with the said hospital during the period 2/8/2010 to 26/8/2010. The history of the patient, as narrated by his mother indicated that the accused i.e. present appellant was ill since last 10 years prior to 2/8/2010. Even after arrest i.e. as an under-trial prisoner, the police had referred the appellant to defence witness No. 1. The doctor has placed on record the medical case record of the appellant from 2/8/2010. The said record is at Exh. 70.

6 The appellant is in custody from 1/2/2011. The learned Counsel for the appellant upon instructions has submitted that at present, the appellant is lodged in the open prison at Paithan and he is Talwalkar 3 of 4 ::: Uploaded on - 19/01/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 08/02/2021 05:42:49 :::

7.APEAL217.2014.doc taking treatment from a psychiatrist. In view of the medical case record proved by Defence witness and the submissions of the learned Counsel for the appellant, it would be necessary to call for report from the Open Prison, Paithan.

7 Learned APP submits that she would call report from the Superintendent of Prison, Open Prison at Paithan, Aurangabad within one week from today. Learned APP shall place the report on record. Stand over to 29/1/2021.

            (N.R. BORKAR, J)         (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J)




Talwalkar                                                                     4 of 4




      ::: Uploaded on - 19/01/2021               ::: Downloaded on - 08/02/2021 05:42:49 :::