Karnataka High Court
S Gowdhami vs Dr Radhakrishna Teachers Education ... on 24 September, 2010
Author: A.S.Bopanna
Bench: A.S.Bopanna
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
BETWEEN
1.
DATED THIS THE 247" DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2010
PRESENT
THE HONBLE MR.J.S.KHEI-EAR, CHIEF ,I:js'r1'O-1:} _
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUsTIOE AA;$.fB'{},P}5aNNA'
ccc No.475/"2O10E'[CiE_.VV_i¥] A
&
ccc Nos.5o9«54'a/_;2_o1o(civi;) jg
s GOWDI-{AMI
Age:26
D/O.SAI_)!&NA.NTI:IAM " O'
AGED 'A30'-;J"r_.2:6 "YEARS 4. ; '
s A S ::NAG--ER.'"SE[;£flVf'MAIN-_ROAD.
THIRUPATHIJR, TMVXIENADUE
SUSHA' " "
D/O.S-INGARAM
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
- 2/444, '*'1"IaA..OHER COLONY, COIMBATORE
'TAMENADU
. '"Ag€I28',j_D*VO.T THANGARAJ
ABOUT 28 YEARS
KEERALKKRANDOOR METTUR
. TAMILNADU
* SORNA
Age:26
W/OJOTHIKESWARAN
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS
150/ 1, PACHAPATTI. 2ND CROSS
NORTH STREET, SALEM 1 TAMILNADU
M KALA
Age:26
D/Oil' K MUNISAMY
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS
KALLAKURICHI
VELLUPURAM DIST
TAMILNADU
E SUMATHI
Age:28
D/OELUMALAI A
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS"«_
R K PET. THIRUALLUR D.I.ST._
TAMILNADU ~ " A
TDEV1
Age:25
I)/O.RTIwI1':'?;\_J(3»AV=_ELg .
AGED _AUB.OL:4{T--.25 YEA_RS,__. ; V
R K PETI', '_T'I~iIRUALL'1JR'D1S'l"~_
B DEEVAI'-El ' "
Age:28 . ,1 A
D/O.M*«BAI.AKRI~SHNAN
AGED AB-OUT 28'YEARs
~ - .U'j%1'};./227% DEVARA-MPATTI
' A J'"E'I"FI'HALI POST,
j DIST
"-'.__TAIV'£ILNAI;3U
S'EL'f;ARANI
Age:.'},'.9
A .-_D/O.MUNIRATHINAM
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
DHRMARAJAPURAM, 38, KALALKOLL
ALANDAVAM. VELLORE DIST
TAMILAN DU
11.
1.2.
G KOKILA
Age:20
D / O.A GOPAL
AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS
VANIAMPADI ROAD.
THIRUPATHUR.
TAMILANDU
G KRISHNAKUMAR
Age:25
S /O.GOV1NDAN
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
OMALUR SALEM DIST
TAMILANDU
E CHANDRAN I
Age:27 '_
S/O.C ELUMALAI
AGED ABOUT 27_YEARS-. A V "
BANANARAM POST, VVELLGREV A
TAMILA1'§D1§.- _ A
'G
S/Q.v_ IvIURU(;}AN_.
AGED ABO~'£.}'l'*~3 YEARS
3/290*.--..NEw "COLONY, ALANGUPPAM VILLAGE
% ;AM.EUR TALUK, A
._':L_"TA_flMiLNADU... _____
f_ " 'C1
, 'D/o.GGVINDAN
AGES ABOUT 20 YEARS
JOHN KENNADY NAGAR
~ SINGARAPATTAI, KRISHNAGIRI DIST
» EAMILNADU
N SASIKUMAR
Age:28
S / ONATARAJAN
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
18.
ANDIPALYAM, KADATHUR POST,
KASIBALVAM ERODE
TAMILNADU
C VIJAYALAKSHMI
Age:3O
D / O. GURUSAMY
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
PARVATI-IA RAJA STREET,
PERIVAKODIVERI, ERODE
TAMILNADU
S BANUMATHI
Age:32
D/O.A SHANMUGAM _ _
AGED ABOUT
3/ 202, SCHOOL MAKKINAMKOMBAI
ERODE g hi; :2'.
TAMILNADU ' '
Agezsi, 5- ..
A,GED_ ABTQIJ? ,3 1. YEARS
sUNGAKKARfMPAL*£A1=.4
DESIBALVAM"~I?UL°IA1Vi'PATTI
ERODE DEST._TAMI.I;NADU
_" :13; IANUNLATHIV
Age:34A,
» .DxVO~.%NANJ_APPA GOUNDER
AGED A}3.0UT 34 YEARS
D *KAVILI;§=>ALAYAM
ERODE DIST TAMILNADU
V "=--.Age:33
' - . JD/O.KALIYAPPA GOUNDAER
K BAKKIYALAKSHMI
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
SUNK MAYAM POST.
PULIAMPATTI
2E.
22.
23.
24.
ERODE DIST TAMILANDU
M SELVI
Age:34
D / QMARAPPA GOUNDER
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
ANTIPALYAM KADATHUR POST
KASIPALAYM
ERODE DIST TAMILANDU I _
C KARPUGAM
Age:32
D/O.GOPAL
KAMACHI AMMAN KOIL
KUDAKARAI _
ERODE DIST TANIILNADU. u
RDEVI
Age:35 _
"
CHE1\I1\I;>;"€??I1w4YAI\g;T.,. '* A
SUND;'&KAMBA}AVPxJV1T_POST;
GOB1-TALUK; "
TAMIL A;~3vI.J__D1STV _ *
M GAANDHI'MATIJ:I'.
Age:2/i~. A A ""
S, ._:D'/'0.MANQKARAN
V. OSPI"l'AE; STREET,
E C~HE'1"T]§'IPALAYAM
A T_ ' TNAMSITTMSRT ERODE DIST.
-V 25.
K ARASATPLAL
Age} 3 5
' 'S-..__W/CLANGAPPAN
= , S35, NADAR STREET, KADATHJR POST
KASIBALYAM
ERODE DIST
TAMILNADU
26.
28.
29.
M VIJAYA
Age:25
W/O .1\/LANICKAM
SANARPUDUR 36 NATAR STREET
KADATHUR POST, KASIPALYAM
ERODE DIST.
TAMILNADU
A SELVI
Age:34
D / QARMUGAM K
ELATHIKUTTITHERU K,
KOLAPALUR POST, 'V V'
TAMILNADU
RVADIVU
Age:2-4
D/ORAMASAMY V
KORA1\/IADAI If
KARATIwI~UVPgA}';AYAM: .
GOBI_.TA],U'KV_._-_'_ERODE DIST, A
P,PARVAT~HIV_
Age:35 ' . V
D /05 R P1'3RUMAVi"------ V' V
92/9,? "MAR1A1\/II\fIA1\f" KOIL STREET
_; E' <:HE'I*m;_~ALYA;M NAMBIYAR
.f_V'GQBI..TALUKT---ERODE DIST
TAD!/111;' 'ADU
'_ V M -VSHL'-T/AVRIESWAM
V"Age:i2V8j_
V D/_O.1\/§ANI K M
D E'-{AM PALYAM
LLBALAVAM
V 'ERODE DIST
'- 'ATAMILNADU
D KALAIYARASI
Age:26
D/ODEVARAJ
VVV'°\xV§NA0AV§'.T, A = V
33.
34.
NO.32, VETTUVAR STREET,
NEAR OLD , K V PALLAVAM
SATHYAMANGALAM
ERODE DIST TAMILNADU
S SASIKALA
Age:26
W/ODHARMALINGAM
ANNANAGAR MAIN ROAD.
BANGALOWPURDUR I
ERODE DIST TAMILNADU
K KALPANA
Age:3O
D/O.KRISI~iNAMUR'I'HY
MUTHUR ERODE... « V
DIST TAMILNADU_ f %
BCHANDRASHEKARAN__ i_
s/o.BAI.GL:iRu
271 '
BUDDLO{JR, POST, TTIRUVALLOR DIST
mM11;A"Nm_1k%iVA%v<.%
M P:1N1'rHA ' ii; V "
Age : 24.. _
fa/o.K M-UANIRATHINAM
G PM MAM
A k .VE.-.LLUR DIST
s I;E1.-AVATH1
Age :2 8
A. D/OSADHANATHAM
'UILLIVATTAM VILLAGE
V' " 'VANIVAMBADI VELLORE
DIST TAMILNADU
37. R RAJALAKSHMI
Age:2O
D/O.R HARE
SRINIVASNAGAR
KARUNYA STREET NO. 14.
AMBATTUR POST
CHEN NAJ TAMILNADU
38. TVIJAYALAKSHMI
Age:2O 1
D/O.TI-IULUKKANAM
VENAMANI VILLAGE I
KARAIPOONDI
POLURTRIVANNAMA1A1'~~.._1' -1
TAMILNADU g 1. .§1:-»COMPL'AINANTS
(By
1fi..D at
INSTI§I'U7{g'IOr'I'13'_.__ V _
sax VISPfi_U;ANA'1'H. V1'oYAsA,MsTHE,
V£SFflVANAT'f%;1AP'URA, DEVANAHALLI TALUK
B;ANGALCiR,E DIST, REP BY rrs SECRE
TARY,_N M 'FHEERTE GOWDA S/O.N K MATADAIA
AGED ABO'UT"'5'1,.YRS, R/AT.NO.383, om) POST
OFFICE ROAD, K 'PURAM, BANGALORE»560036
1. DR 1EACHl§RS"EDUCATION
%%%%% ~ " RESPONDENT/
ACCUSED
M s RAJENDRA PRASAD ASSTS.)
T1iese".CCCs are filed under Secs.11 8: 12 of the
"..Conte1"npt of Court Act praying to initiate contempt
'- "vc.p1'oc.eedings against the accused for disobeying the
"--o1'derf dated 21.1.2010 passed in WP Nos.32940--
;;329s1/2009.
These CCCs coming on for orders this day, Chief
Justice passed the following:
ORDER
WW6"
ORDER J .S.KHEHAR, C.J. (Oral):
1Vlr.R.C.Nagaraj. Adv. for the complainants- petitioners. Sri M .S . Raj endra Prasad, it ' ' _ Sr.Counse1 for accused--~Re;s.ponde;1t."'"~--EfiAccusVedtg'4 "
respondent is also present in Court iifiiperson; it '
2. In terms of 'Ben'c1'l_1Hdlated 23.9.2010, eleven been handed over by__the Secretarnl 'AA'5l{7..'iv:Elsl*iwanath Vidya Samsthe Eearned counsel for the complainantsépetitionersif V the handing over of the aforesaid L"~..cer?;ifi'Cates','~.-"ll learned counsel for the 'll'~._coinplainants--petiti--sners states, that the order dated by this Court, on account of non-
coxnpliancvelifivliereof. the instant contempt petition came to be" Vvt'il.ed by the compla1'nants--petitioners, has now V' 'T fully complied with.
4. In View of the statement made by the learned counsel for the complainant--petitioners, we find no I0 justification in continuing the present proceedings any ' further. The proceedings against the accused- respondent are accordingly dropped.
sa * d 1 Ad Sk/ - 3 Index: yes / no ..