Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Smt Gangamma vs Smt Tholasamma on 14 July, 2022

                            1


     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

         DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2022

                        BEFORE

 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

      WRIT PETITION NO.13782 OF 2022 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
1.    SMT GANGAMMA
      W/O NAGARAJU
      AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS
      RESIDING AT NO.56
      KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD
      RAVUGODLU GATE
      BANGALORE-560082.

2.    SMT. BHAGYAMMA
      W/O SHIVALINGAIAH
      D/O LATE MUDDANNA
      AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
      RESIDING AT ASHWATHAPPA LAYOUT
      3RD FLOOR, NEW POLICE STATION
      THALAGHATAPURA
      BANGALORE-560062.

3.    SMT MANGALA
      W/O VENKATESH
      S/O LATE MUDDANNA
      AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
      RESIDING AT NO.327
      8TH MAIN 1ST BLOCK
      KALYAN NAGAR
      HRBR LAYOUT
                            2


     BANGALORE-560

4.   SMT VIJAYA M
     W/O MANJUNATH
     D/O LATE MUDDANNA
     AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
     RESIDING AT NO.256
     POLICE STATION ROAD
     THALAGHATAPURA
     BANGALORE-560062.

                                      ... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. VENKATESHA T.S., ADVOCATE)

AND:
1.   SMT THOLASAMMA
     D/O LATE LAKSHMANAPPA
     AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
2.   SRI LENKAPPA
     S/O LATE LAKSHMANAPPA
     AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
3.   SMT VAJRAMMA
     D/O LATE LAKSHMANAPPA
     AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS

4.   SMT SHARADAMMA
     D/O LATE LAKSHMANAPPA
     AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
5.   SMT VARADAMMA
     W/O LATE LAKSHMANAPPA
     AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS
                            3


6.   SRI HANUMANTHARAYAPPA
     S/O LATE LAKSHMANAPPA
     AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS

7.   SRI VENKATASWAMY
     S/O LATE LAKSHMANAPPA
     AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS

8.   SMT GOWRAMMA
     W/O LATE LAKSHMANAPPA
     AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

9.   SMT MAALAMMA
     W/O LATE CHOWDAPPA
     AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

10. SRI VAJRAPPA
    S/O LATE LAKSHMANAPPA
    AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

11. SRI MANJUNATH
    S/O LATE LAKSHMANAPPA
    AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS


12. SMT DHANALAKSHMI
    W/O LATE LAKSHMANAPPA
    AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS

13. SMT MUNILAKSHMAMMA
    D/O LATE MUDDANNA
    AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS

14. SRI THIMMAPPA
    S/O LATE MUDDANNA
    AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
                           4


15. SRI MANJUNATH
    S/O LATE MUDDANNA
    AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS

16. SRI SUBHASH
    S/O LATE MUDDANNA
    AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

17. SRI ASHWATHA
    S/O LATE NARAYANASWAMY
    AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS

18. SMT VAJRAMMA
    S/O LATE NARAYANASWAMY
    AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
19. SRI CHOWDAPPA
    S/O LATE NARAYANASWAMY
    AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS

20. SRI MUNIRAMU
    S/O LATE NARAYANASWAMY
    AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
21. SMT GANGAMMA
    D/O LATE NARAYANASWAMY
    AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS

22. SRI MUNIKRISHNA
    S/O LATE NARAYANASWAMY
    AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS

23. SMT GOWRI
    S/O LATE NARAYANASWAMY
    AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS


    ALL ARE RESIDING AT
    THALAGHATAPURA VILLAGE
                                   5


    UTTARAHALLI HOBLI
    BANGALORE.
                                   ... RESPONDENTS
(BY SHI. L.M. CHIDANANDAYYA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R15)
                        ---
      THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES
226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
CALL FOR RECORDS IN OS.NO.264/2022 IN THE FILE OF
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU, RURAL AT
BENGALURU QUASH THE ORDER DATED:09.06.2022 IN
O.S. NO.264/2022 IN THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU, RURAL AT BENGALURU ANNX-
A & ETC.

     THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS,
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                           ORDER

The captioned writ petition is filed questioning the order of the trial Court passed on I.A.No.II filed under Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) of CPC. The Trial Court has allowed the said application and has consequently, rejected the plaint.

2. Against rejection of plaint, the plaintiffs have the remedy of an appeal under Section 96 of CPC. Therefore, office objection in regard to maintainability of writ petition is upheld. 6

3. The writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable. In the event, the petitioners avail the remedy of an appeal within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the petitioners are entitled for the benefit under Section 14 of the Limitation Act.

4. The Registry shall return all the certified copies after securing photo copy of the same.

Sd/-

JUDGE *alb/-