Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Madhu S vs Travancore Devaswom Board on 29 June, 2022

Author: V Raja Vijayaraghavan

Bench: V Raja Vijayaraghavan

WP(C) No.20301/2022                         1/4




                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                          PRESENT
                      THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
             Wednesday, the 29th day of June 2022 / 8th Ashadha, 1944
                            WP(C) NO. 20301 OF 2022(K)
   PETITIONER:

          MADHU S., S/O. SIVASANKARA PILLAI, AGED 51 YEARS, RESIDING AT
          KARUNILAM, THAKAZHY P.O., ALAPPUZHA - 688 562 (PRESENTLY WORKING AS
          WATCHER AT THE KAMAPURAM DEVASWOM, THAKAZHY SUB GROUP, AMBALAPUZHA
          UNDER TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD)

   RESPONDENTS:

      1. TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NANTHANCODE, KAWDIAR POST,
         THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 003 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
      2. COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD,
         NANTHANCODE, KAWDIAR POST, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 003.
      3. DEPUTY DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE
         DEVASWOM BOARD, NANTHANCODE, KAWDIAR POST, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695
         003
      4. KERALA DEVASWOM RECRUITMENT BOARD, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD
         BUILDING, M. G. ROAD, AYURVEDA COLLEGE JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
         - 695 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
      5. SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, DEVASWOM DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT
         SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001
      6. SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL JUSTICE,
         GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695
         001
      7. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT
         SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001


        Writ petition (civil) praying inter alia that in the circumstances
   stated in the affidavit filed along with the WP(C) the High Court be
   pleased to (A) Stay the opertion of Ext.P6 order dated 22-01-2022 to the
   extent it restricts the benefits due under the 1995 - Act from
   22-09-2021(date of identification of the post); and (b) restrain the 1st
   and 2nd respondents from making appointments pursuant to Ext.P9
   notification dated 18-05-2022, without obtaining express orders from this
   Hon'ble Court; or in the alternative, (c) direct the 1st and 2nd
   respondents to keep one vacancy out of 50 vacances notified in Ext.P9
   notification unfilled, until disposal of this Writ Petition.

        This petition again coming on for orders upon perusing the petition
   and the affidavit filed in support of WP(C) and this Court's order dated
   23-06-2022 and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.SHAMEENA SALAHUDHEEN,
   O.M.SHALINA, T.V.VINU & JISEMOL THOMAS, Advocates for the petitioner, SRI.
   C.K. PAVITHRAN, STANDING COUNSEL for respondents 1,2 & 3, SRI.
 WP(C) No.20301/2022                    2/4

   V.V.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR, STANDING COUNSEL for respondent 4 and of
   GOVERNMENT PLEADER for respondents 5 to 7, the court passed the
   following:
 WP(C) No.20301/2022                            3/4




                             RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, J.
                            -------------------------------------
                             W.P.(C) No.20301 of 2022
                           -------------------------------------------
                         Dated this the 29th day of June, 2022


                                           ORDER

It is pointed out by Smt.Shameena Salahudheen, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, that an inadvertent error has crept into para 5 of the interim order dated 23.6.2022. It appears to be correct.

In that view of the matter, the interim order dated 23.6.2022 shall stand modified and there will be a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to keep aside one vacancy out of 50 vacancies as notified in Ext.P9. The respondents shall also refrain from making appointments pursuant to Ext.P9 notification, without securing orders from this Court.

Post after ten days.

Sd/-

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, JUDGE IAP 29-06-2022 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar WP(C) No.20301/2022 4/4 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 20301/2022 Exhibit P9 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION NO.707R1/2022/K.D.R.B. DATED 18.05.2022 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT