Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Mr.Kaushlendra Kumar vs Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare on 8 January, 2014

                            Central Information Commission
            Room No. 305, 2nd Floor, 'B' Wing, August Kranti Bhavan,
                         Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi­110066
                         Web: www.cic.gov.in Tel No: 26167931

                                                       Case No. CIC/LS/A/2013/001377­SS
                                                                         January 8, 2014

Appellant                       :        Shri Kaushlendra Kumar

Respondents             :               Medical Council of India

Date of Hearing                 :        08.01.2014


                                            ORDER

The   present   appeal,   filed   by   Shri   Kaushlendra   Kumar   against   Medical  Council of India, was taken up for hearing on 08.01.2014 when the Respondents  were   present   through   Shri   Shikhar   Ranjan,   Law   Officer.   The   Appellant   was  represented by his authorised representative, Dr. Gautam.

2. The Appellant through an RTI application dated 13.02.2013, filed before the  CPIO,   Medical   Council   of   India,   New   Delhi,   sought   certain   information   on   the  subject: "Irregularity in admission process for PG seats at Katihar Medical College   (KMC), Katihar," This application included queries, such as  what is the meaning of   admission   against   casual   vacancy   for   various   PG  courses   as   mentioned   in   the   letter  dated 19.07.2012 of KMC, Katihar sent to MCI with subject 'furnishing the   CIC/LS/A/2013/001377­SS Page 1 of 4 2 information of the students admitted in PG courses at KMC during academic year   2012­13'   ;   The   names   of   students   sent   by  KMC   by   letter   dated   19.07.2012   and   25.06.2011 for admission to MCI for various PG courses for the year 2012 and 2011   respectively; whether there is excess admission under management quota against   the state Government quota; what is the time duration within which the discharge   notice  has   to be  issued  to the  students  admitted  in  excess under  management   quota by KMC, Katihar and so on.

3. The   CPIO   vide   his   letter   dated   12.03.2013   gave   point   wise   reply   to   the  Appellant. In response to point Nos. 2, 4, 5 & 6 of the RTI application, he furnished  a copy of letter dated 09.03.2012 to the Appellant. As for the remaining points, he  stated   that   the   queries   mentioned   in   these   points   are   in   the   nature   of   eliciting  opinion and that therefore they do not constitute information as defined in section  2(f) of the RTI Act.

4. Aggrieved   by   this   reply,   the   Appellant   filed   an   appeal   dated   08.04.2013  before the Appellate Authority which the Appellate Authority decided vide his order  dated 07.05.2013 holding that the CPIO has provided the maximum information as  per the available records.

5. The   Appellant   then   filed   the   present   appeal   before   the   Commission  challenging the order of the Appellate Authority.

6. During   the   hearing,   the   representative   of   the   Appellant   alleges   that   the  Katihar   Medical   College   is   violating   the   admission   rules   by   exceeding   the  Management   quota,   but   the   MCI,   which   is   a   regulatory   body   over   all   medical  colleges, is not taking any action against them. The Respondents submit that the  2 matter is presently sub­juidce in Patna High Court and that the Katihar Medical  College has also challenged the applicability of MCI regulation to them before the  court.   They   thus   express   their   inability   to  provide   any  further   information   to   the  Appellant beyond what has already been provided to him. Moreover the queries of  the Appellant are more in nature of seeking opinion of the public authority rather  than specific material information as defined in section 2(f) of the RTI Act.

7. Having   heard   the   submission   and   perused   the   records,   the   Commission  hereby directs the CPIO to furnish an appropriate reply to the Appellant apprising  him of the factual and current position of the matter within 2 weeks of receipt of this  order.  

8. Appeal is disposed of with the above direction.

 (Sushma Singh) Chief Information Commissioner CIC/LS/A/2013/001377­SS Page 3 of 4 4 Authenticated by (D.C. Singh) Deputy Registrar Address to the Parties:

1. Shri Kaushlendra Kumar D­21/3, DRDO Township Kanchanbagh Hyderabad 500058
2. The Central Public Information Officer (RTI) & Deputy Secretary  Medical Council of India Pocket­14, Sector - 8 Dwarka Phase­1 New Delhi 110077
 3. The Appellate Authority (RTI) & Addl. Secretary  Medical Council of India Pocket­14, Sector - 8 Dwarka Phase­1 New Delhi 110077   4