Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 5]

Patna High Court - Orders

Mithilsh Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 18 September, 2013

Author: Amaresh Kumar Lal

Bench: Amaresh Kumar Lal

                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Criminal Miscellaneous No.33382 of 2013
                 ======================================================
                 Mithilesh Kumar S/O Sri Rajendra Prasad Gupta Resident Of Village
                 Phango, P.S. Mansi, District Khagaria.

                                                                .... ....   Petitioner/s
                                              Versus
                 The State Of Bihar                   .... .... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   18-09-2013

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is in custody since 19.6.2013 for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC.

The allegation is that a man cheated the informant on the pretext of helping him in withdrawing money from ATM and later on he withdrew Rs.2,44,000/- from his account. The FIR was lodged against unknown. The name of the petitioner has appeared during investigation.

It is submitted that the petitioner is a guard of ATM Centre, SBI, near Baghwa Chouk, whereas, the allegation is of ATM Centre, Rajasthan Hotel Khagaria market.

It is further submitted that charge-sheet has been submitted and there is no likelihood of tampering with the evidence.

Considering the facts and circumstances, the above Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33382 of 2013 (2) dt.18-09-2013 2/2 named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria/ court concerned in Khagaria P. S. Case No. 208 of 2013 after framing of charge with following conditions:-

1. The petitioner will not indulge himself in similar or any other offence.
2. One of the bailors must be the close relative of the petitioner.
3. The petitioner will be well represented in the Court on each and every date and in case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of terms of bail, his bail bond would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Kanchan/-