Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Narayanbhai vs Gujarat on 12 April, 2012

Author: Sonia Gokani

Bench: Sonia Gokani

  
 Gujarat High Court Case Information System 
    
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/18565/2011	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 18565 of 2011
 

 
=================================================
 

NARAYANBHAI
RAICHANDBHAI PATEL(GUARANTOR) - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

GUJARAT
STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION THRO AUTHORISED OFFICER - Respondent(s)
 

================================================= 
Appearance
: 
M/S
PATEL ADVOCATES for Petitioner(s) : 1, 
None for Respondent(s) :
1, 
=================================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MS JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 12/04/2012 

 

ORAL
ORDER 

1. In this petition moved under Article 227 of the Constitution of India , relief prayed for are as follows:-

"12(a) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction and be pleased to call for the records of Misc. Civil Application No.31/2009 from the Court of Ahmedabad (Rural), Ahmedabad.
12(b) To direct the concerned Rural Court Ahmedabad to expedite the hearing of the matter being Civil Miscellaneous Application No.31/2009 at the earliest possible, preferably within stipulated time frame;"

2. Learned advocate Mr. Hasmukh Patel has taken this Court through the long drawn litigations between the parties and urged as to why there is a need to direct expeditious hearing of the suit. He, however, admitted that no such request had been made to the concerned Court in Miscellaneous Civil Application No.31 of 2009. He is being permitted to withdraw this petition to move concerned Court for making a request of expeditious hearing of CMA No.31 of 2009 and keeping in mind all the litigations between the parties and some of the directions issued by this Court, Court concerned shall appropriately decide the request. In the event of any difficulty needless to say that the petitioner will be liberty to approach this Court. Petition stands disposed of accordingly.

(Ms. Sonia Gokani, J.) sudhir     Top