Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Sandeep Chandrprakash Goenka And Anr vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 2 January, 2023

Author: Prithviraj K. Chavan

Bench: Revati Mohite Dere, Prithviraj K. Chavan

NISHA            Digitally signed by NISHA
                 SANDEEP CHITNIS
SANDEEP          Date: 2023.01.04 14:23:32
CHITNIS          +0530
                                                                                    27-aplst.20729.2022.doc


                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                               CRIMINAL APPLICATION (STAMP) NO.20729 OF 2022

                    Sandeep Chandrprakash Goenka and Anr.                                ...Applicants
                         Versus
                    The State of Maharashtra and Anr.                                    ...Respondents

                    Ms. Sonal Parab i/b Rajeev Sawant and Associates, for the Applicants.

                    Ms. S. S. Kaushik, A.P.P for the Respondent No.1- State.

                    Mr. Dhwani Jariwala, for the Respondent No.2.

                    API - Viraj Jagadale, Kandivali Police Station, Mumbai, is present.


                                                          CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE &
                                                                  PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ.
                                                          DATE     : 2nd JANUARY 2023

                   P.C. :

1. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicants seeks leave to amend to comply with Section 74 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. Leave granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.

2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants. N. S. Chitnis 1/2

27-aplst.20729.2022.doc

3. Issue notice to the respondents. Learned APP waives notice on behalf of the respondent No.1-State and seeks time to take instructions. Mr. Jariwala, waives notice on behalf of the respondent No.2. He states that he has not been served with a copy of the aforesaid application.

4. Learned Counsel for the applicants assures to serve a copy of the aforesaid application on the learned counsel for the respondent No.2, during the course of the day, after carrying out the necessary amendment in the copy to be served on the learned counsel for the respondent No.2. Statement accepted.

5. Stand over to 16th January 2023.

PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. N. S. Chitnis 2/2