Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Ashmita Kapoor vs State Of H.P. & Ors on 7 July, 2023

Bench: Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Satyen Vaidya

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA

                                           CWP No. 4347/2023
                                           Decided on: 7.7.2023

    Ashmita Kapoor                                                           .....Petitioner

                                   Versus




                                                                              .

    State of H.P. & ors.                                                  ....Respondents


    Coram:





    The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
    The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
    Whether approved for reporting?1No





    For the Petitioner:                    Mr. S. D. Gill, Advocate.
    For the Respondents:                   Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr.
                                           Ramakant Sharma, Ms. Sharmila
                       r                   Patial, Addl. A.Gs., Ms. Priyanka
                                           Chauhan, Dy.A.G. & Mr. Rajat

                                           Chauhan, Law Officer.

    _____________________________________________________________________
                  Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (oral)

Aggrieved by the order of transfer, the petitioner has filed the instant petition for grant of the following substantive relief:-

"that the writ in the nature of certiorari may kindly be issued and order of transfer dated 1.7.2023 (Annexure P-1) may very kindly be quashed and set aside in the interest of justice and fair play."

2 A perusal of the record that was produced by the respondent-State pursuant to the directions issued to this effect, would go to reveal that even though the transfer of the petitioner 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

::: Downloaded on - 12/07/2023 20:35:26 :::CIS 2

has been effected on the basis of D.O. note issued by local MLA, however there is no independent application of mind by the administrative authority. Rather there is an expressed dissent that in case the transfer is implemented, working of the project, .

which is at last stage, may suffer. Obviously, in such circumstances, the impugned transfer order cannot sustain and the same is accordingly quashed and set aside.

3 The instant petition is disposed of, in the aforesaid terms, so also the pending application(s), if any.

                        r                          (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
                                                           Judge


                                                         (Satyen Vaidya)
    7.7.2023                                                  Judge


        (pankaj)







                                                  ::: Downloaded on - 12/07/2023 20:35:26 :::CIS