Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

R.Shankar vs Minor Rahul on 11 December, 2024

                             BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                  DATED: 11.12.2024

                                                         CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR

                                            C.R.P.(MD)(PD)No.818 of 2020
                                                        and
                                             C.M.P.(MD)No.5554 of 2020

                   1.R.Shankar
                   2.R.Kumar                                           ... Petitioners

                                                          -vs.-


                   1.Minor Rahul
                   2.Minor Ajay
                   both are represented by their Mother
                         and Natural Guardian, S.J.Priya               ...Respondent

                   PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of
                   India to set aside the fair and final order, dated 20.02.2020 made in I.A.No.4 of
                   2019 in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in Probate O.P.No.1 of 2017 on the file of the
                   Principal District Court, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur.


                                        For Petitioner  :Mr.Anvithkumar
                                                        for Mr.A.Sivaji
                                        For Respondents :Mr.Jothi Basu
                                                       *****


                   _______________
                   Page 1 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                         ORDER

                             The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the order

                   passed in I.A.No.4 of 2019 in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in Probate O.P.No.1 of 2017,

                   dated 20.02.2020, by the learned Principal District Judge, Virudhunagar

                   District at Srivilliputhur.

                             2.The respondents, who are minors, represented by their natural

                   guardian, have filed a Probate Original Petition in Pro.O.P.No.1 of 2017 before

                   the Principal District Court, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur, to pass an

                   order granting probate of the Will, dated 10.09.2014 executed by

                   S.R.Jeganatharaja. During the pendency of that petition, the the Revision

                   Petitioners/respondents filed a petition in I.A.No.4 of 2019 in I.A.No.1 of 2019

                   in Pro.O.P.No.1 of 2017 to mark certain documents, which are annexed along

                   with the application.



                             3.The trial Court after hearing the both sides and by taking into

                   consideration the Section 281 of the Hindu Succession Act, with regard to the

                   nature of title of S.R.Jeganatharaja and the fact that a case was registered in

                   Cr.No.5 of 2014 for the offences punishable under Sections 222, 223, 276, 281


                   _______________
                   Page 2 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                   and 295 IPC, had dismissed the said application by observing that those

                   documents are relevant to prove the case in Probate Original Petition.

                   Challenging the same, present Civil Revision Petition has been filed.



                             4.The learned Counsel for the Revision Petitioner contended that the

                   documents which are need to be marked are primary documents and dismissing

                   the application without assigning any reasons will cause irreparable loss to the

                   petitioners herein.



                             5.The learned Counsel appearing for the respondents contended that the

                   Revision Petitioners have not taken a stand that the documents filed in the

                   application are relevant and there are no pleadings in the application and in the

                   absence of any pleadings, the said documents could not be marked before the

                   trial Court.



                             6.It is not in dispute that at the time of marking of documents, the

                   respondents has a right to oppose the same and the said objection shall be

                   considered by the trial Court while deciding the finality of the original petition.


                   _______________
                   Page 3 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                   Though the revision petitioner contended that those documents are primary

                   documents, whether it is primary documents or secondary documents shall be

                   considered by the trial Court at the time of marking of documents and any

                   objections raised by the respondents will be considered by the trial Court.



                             7.With the above, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of and the

                   order passed in I.A.No.4 of 2019 in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in Probate O.P.No.1 of

                   2017, dated 20.02.2020 by the learned Principal District Judge, Virudhunagar

                   District at Srivilliputhur, is set aside. As the Probate Original Petition is of the

                   year 2017, the trial Court is directed to conclude the proceedings within a

                   period of one year from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

                   Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.




                                                                                 11.12.2024

                   Internet             :Yes/No
                   NCC                  :Yes/No
                   Index                :Yes/No

                   cmr


                   _______________
                   Page 4 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                   To

                   The Principal District Judge, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur.




                   _______________
                   Page 5 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                          N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.

cmr C.R.P.(MD)(PD)No.818 of 2020 11.12.2024 _______________ Page 6 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis