Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Gd vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 24 March, 2014

Author: Sanjib Banerjee

Bench: Sanjib Banerjee

                                   1



42   24.03.2014
                                 W.P. 13591 (W) of 2013
                           Eastern Paper Mills Ltd. & Anr.
     gd                                  Vs.
                            The State of West Bengal & Ors.

                          Mr. P. Sancheti
                          Ms. Mrittika Mitra
                                  ..for the petitioners

                          Mr. Bimal Chatterjee, Ld. Advocate General
                          Mr. Sakya Sen
                          Mr. Shyamal Sanyal
                                 ..for the State

                          Mr. Srijib Chakraborty
                                  ..for the Municipality



                        The petition has been filed some 32 years after

                  the petitioners claim to have been allotted a 31-cottah

                  plot in Salt Lake.

                        It does not appear that after the initial letters

                  issued within the first 10 years of allotment, the

                  petitioners took much interest in the matter except

                  writing a few more letters some four-five years back.

                  However, it appears that the petitioners deposited the

                  money of about Rs.6 lakh in the year 1981 itself.

                        The reason for the petitioners coming to court is

                  that the petitioners have come to learn that a

                  swimming pool is now proposed to be constructed on
                 2


the land allotted to the petitioners in 1981.

      Indeed, there is a subsequent petition which has

been filed by a contractor that despite the contractor

being identified for the award of the work for the

construction of the swimming pool, the site has not

been handed over to the contractor.

      The State has submitted in such other matter

that the site may be handed over by the State to the

Bidhannagar Municipality subject to the result in the

present petition. It was in such circumstances that the

present petition was directed to appear in the list.

      Since it does not appear that the petitioners have

shown much interest between 1981 and 2013 despite

the allotment having apparently been made in 1981

and since the petitioners can be compensated by

refund of the money that may have been paid along

with interest and since it is also possible for the State

to allot some other land to the petitioners in the event

the writ petition is allowed, no specific order is made on

this petition restraining the respondents from dealing

with the land which may have been notionally allotted to the petitioners in the year 1981.

Affidavit-in-opposition be filed within four weeks 3 from date; reply thereto, if any, may be filed within a fortnight thereafter.

The petition will appear for hearing in the monthly list of July, 2014.

(Sanjib Banerjee, J.) 4