Section 381 in The Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888
381. [ Filling in of pools, etc., which are a nuisance. [This section was substituted for the original section by Bombay 6 of 1913, Section 4.]
- [(1) (i) For the purposes of this section a nuisance shall include -(a)any pool, ditch, tank, well, pond, quarry-hole, drain, water course or any collection of water; or(b)any cistern or other receptacle for water or any article or thing capable of collecting rain water during the monsoon season whether within or outside a building; or(c)any and on which water accumulates or is likely to accumulate; or(d)any premises or any part of any premises occupied, or unoccupied, or under construction, reconstruction or demolition; which in the opinion of the Commissioner is, or is likely to become a breeding place of mosquitoes or which is, in any other respect, a nuisance as defined in clause (3) of section 3.(ii)The Commissioner may, by notice in writing, require the person by whose act, default or sufferance, a nuisance arises, exists or continues, or is likely to arise, and the owner, lessee and occupier of the land, building or premises on which the nuisance arises, exists or continues or is likely to arise or any one or more of such person, owner, lessee and occupier, to remove, discontinue or abate the nuisance by taking such measures and by executing such work in such manner and within such period of time as the Commissioner shall prescribe in such notice.(iii)The Commissioner may also by any notice under clause (ii) or by another notice, served on such person, owner, lessee and occupier, or on any one or more of them, require them or any one or more of them, to take all steps requisite or necessary to prevent a recurrence of the nuisance and may, if he thinks it desirable, specify any work to be executed or measures to be carried out for that purpose, and may serve any such further notice notwithstanding that the nuisance may have been abated or removed if he considers that it is likely to recur:Provided that if at any time within four months from the date of the service of any such notice, the nuisance recurs through the failure of the person or persons upon whom such notice has been served to comply with the requirements contained in such notice, such person or persons shall be liable without any further notice to the penalties provided in this Act for offences under this section.(iv)Where the nuisance arises or exists or is likely to arise or recur in connection with the construction, reconstruction or demolition of any premises, or any part of any premises, the Commissioner may in addition to serving any notice on any one or more of the persons mentioned in clause (ii) serve any such notice on any architect, contractor or other person employed to carry out such work of construction, reconstruction, or demolition and also on any sub-contractor employed by such contractor or other person, or any one or more of such contractor; person and sub-contractor.](2)If [any person who, by a requisition made under sub-section (1), is required] to fill up, cover over or drain of a well, delivers to the Commissioner, within the time prescribed for compliance therewith written objections to such requisition, the Commissioner shall report such objections to the [Standing Committee] [These words, figure and brackets were substituted for the original words by Bombay 10 of 1928, Section 14(b)(i).] and shall make further inquiry into the case, and he shall not institute any prosecution under section 517 for failure to comply with such requisition except with the approval of the [Standing Committee] [These words were substituted for the words 'the Mayor-in-Council' by Maharashtra 27 of 1999, Section 158(b), (w.e.f. 23-4-1999).], but the Commissioner may nevertheless, if he deems the execution of the work called for by such requisition to be of urgent importance, proceed in accordance with section 489 and, pending [ [the Standing Committee] [The words were substituted for the words 'the Standing Committee's disposal' by Maharashtra 10 of 1998, Section 189(c).] disposal] of the question whether the said well shall be permanently filled up, covered over or otherwise dealt with, may cause such well to be securely covered over, so as to prevent the ingress of mosquitoes, and in every such case the Commissioner shall determine, with the approval of [the Standing Committee] [These words were substituted for the words the 'Member-in-Charge' by Maharashtra 27 of 1999, Section 158(a), (w.e.f. 23-4-1999).], whether the expenses of any work already done as aforesaid shall be paid by such [person] [The word 'person' was substituted for the original word 'owner' by Bombay 10 of 1928, Section 14(b)(ii).], or by the Commissioner out of the municipal fund or shall be shared, and, if so, in what proportions.]
