Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Rachna vs State Of U.P. on 10 February, 2022

Bench: Chief Justice, A.S. Bopanna, Hima Kohli

     ITEM NO.5                 Court 1 (Video Conferencing)                      SECTION II

                                S U P R E M E C O U R T O F                I N D I A
                                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).731/2022

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03-03-2021
     in CRLR No.2541/2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature at
     Allahabad)

     RACHNA & ORS.                                                              Petitioner(s)
                                                       VERSUS
     STATE OF U.P. & ANR.                                                       Respondent(s)

     (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.12740/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING
     C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.12741/2022-EXEMPTION FROM
     FILING O.T. and IA No.12742/2022-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF
     DATES)

     Date : 10-02-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA
                         HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI

     For Petitioner(s)                   Mr. Gaurav Sharma, AOR
                                         Mr. Dhawal Mohan, Adv.
                                         Mr. Prateek Bhatia, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)

                         UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                            O R D E R

The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. Having heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and on carefully perusing the material placed on record, we see no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court.

The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed. As a sequel to the above, pending interlocutory applications also stand disposed of.

Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by
SATISH KUMAR YADAV
Date: 2022.02.10
17:28:15 IST
Reason:



     (SATISH KUMAR YADAV)                                                      (R.S. NARAYANAN)
       DEPUTY REGISTRAR                                                       COURT MASTER (NSH)