Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Dinesh vs State & Anr on 13 January, 2017

Author: Vijay Bishnoi

Bench: Vijay Bishnoi

     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR


              S.B.Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1388 / 2016
Shri Dinesh Tanwar S/o Shri Chanda Lal R/o House No.102,
Housing Complex Sector 11 Rohini, New Delhi 110085

                                                        ----Petitioner
                               Versus
  1. The State of Rajasthan


  2. Smt. Hemlata W/o Dinesh Tanwar D/o Late Shri Narendra
     Kumar adopted D/o Laxmikant Aged about 30 years B/c
     Dhanka at present R/o 265, Ashok Vihar, Shikargarh,
     Jodhpur.

                                                   ----Respondents


_____________________________________________________
For Petitioner(s)   : Mr. Atul Sharma

For Respondents     : Mr. V.S. Rajpurohit, PP

_____________________________________________________
            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI

Judgment / Order 13/01/2017 This Criminal Misc. Petition under 482 Cr.P.C. is filed by the petitioner while challenging FIR No.19/2016 of Police Station Mahila Thana Jodhpur East for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 406/34 of IPC. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the factual report wherein it is mentioned that the police after thorough investigation into the allegations levelled in the impugned FIR has filed charge-sheet against the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 498-A IPC on 15.07.2016 before the court concerned.

(2 of 2) [CRLMP-1388/2016] In view of the fact that the charge-sheet has already been filed against the petitioner, no further order is required to be passed in this petition.

It is also to be noticed that this petition is presented before this Court on 25.03.2016 and the has pointed out six defects, which have not been removed till date.

Hence, this petition is dismissed for not removal of defects and for the reasons that the charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner.

(VIJAY BISHNOI)J. Gaurav