Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Paulraj V.S. vs The Chairman, The Central Board, Rep. By ... on 28 September, 2015

Bench: T.S. Thakur, V. Gopala Gowda

                                                 1


     ITEM NO.45                          COURT NO.2               SECTION XII

                               S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     CONMT.PET.(C) No. 529/2015 In C.A. No. 2059/2014

     PAULRAJ V.S.                                                  Petitioner(s)

                                                VERSUS

     THE CHAIRMAN, THE CENTRAL BOARD, REP. BY SMT. GOWRI KUMAR & ANR.
                                                      Respondent(s)

     (with office report)


     Date : 28/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA

     For Petitioner(s)             Petitioner-in-person


     For Respondent(s)             Ms. Aparna Bhat, Adv.


                          UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                             O R D E R

The contempt petition is dismissed in terms of the signed order.

(Shashi Sareen) (Veena Khera) AR-cum-PS Court Master (Signed order is placed on the file) Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Shashi Sareen Date: 2015.09.30 10:05:18 IST Reason: 2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (C) 529 OF 2015 IN CIVIL APPEAL No. 2059 OF 2014 PAULRAJ V.S. ... Petitioner(s) Versus THE CHAIRMAN, THE CENTRAL BOARD, REP. BY SMT. ... Respondent(s) GOWRI KUMAR AND ANR.

O R D E R Heard.

We see no reason to initiate any contempt proceedings as prayed for. The contempt petition is accordingly dismissed.

The petitioner shall however be free to seek appropriate redress in fresh proceedings before the appropriate court if he is aggrieved by the result of the consideration according to him.

.................J. (T.S.THAKUR) ..................J. (V.GOPALA GOWDA) New Delhi, Dated: 28th September, 2015.